Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bryantville Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Bryantville Elementary

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Pembroke (02310000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Bryantville Elementary (02310003)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05,06
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-34-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total121267.57867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total9.510.3-5.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 92%-78%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage85%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total121267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total9.210.3-
Percentage of possible points 89%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage89%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 63

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 496.7 502.2 5.5 498.2 2994Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 477.5 483.2 5.7 483.0 523Met Target
High needs 492.3 495.1 2.8 494.1 984Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 495.5 499.0 3.5 496.8 664Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 480.8 481.4 0.6 482.6 442Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 496.8 502.4 5.6 498.5 2874Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 500.1 503.2 3.1 501.6 2994Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 472.1 481.9 9.8 475.1 524Exceeded Target
High needs 487.8 492.7 4.9 489.4 994Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 491.7 495.7 4.0 492.7 674Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 473.4 478.5 5.1 475.2 444Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 500.3 503.4 3.1 502.0 2874Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 71.2 85.4 14.2 73.9 824Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 51.1 76.6 25.5 54.5 324Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 25--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 71.0 85.2 14.2 73.8 814Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.5 50.0 2183Met Target
Lowest Performing 49.2 50.0 522Below Target
High needs 46.3 50.0 752Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 48.9 50.0 512Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 38.4 50.0 351Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 51.6 50.0 2113Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 54.0 50.0 2173Met Target
Lowest Performing 55.7 50.0 513Met Target
High needs 53.5 50.0 753Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 53.5 50.0 513Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 51.0 50.0 353Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 54.2 50.0 2103Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 7.4 23.1 -15.7 6.1 4380Declined
Lowest Performing 9.3 32.7 -23.4 5.4 520Declined
High needs 12.2 29.3 -17.1 9.9 1570Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.0 38.8 -23.8 11.9 850Declined
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 9.2 33.3 -24.1 5.4 690Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 7.5 23.0 -15.5 5.8 4180Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 302 301100Yes 1 301 301100Yes 1 82 82100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 100 9999Yes 1 100 100100Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 68 6799Yes 1 68 68100Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 8---- 8---- 0----
Students w/ disabilities 44 44100Yes 1 44 44100Yes 1 14----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 2---- 2---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 2---- 2---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino---------------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 7---- 7---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 0----
White 290 289100Yes 1 289 289100Yes 1 81 81100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles