Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Fisher Hill School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Dexter Park

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Orange (02230000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Dexter Park (02230010)
GRADES SERVED
03,04,05,06
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationRequiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
In need of focused/targeted support
Low subgroup performance: White
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
80% - Meeting targets11

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-44-
Mathematics achievement24-44-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total91267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total4822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.04410.0
Weighted total7.410.3-6.77.6-
Percentage of possible points 72%-88%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage80%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement24-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total101267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total8.110.3-
Percentage of possible points 79%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage79%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 16

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 487.5 489.7 2.2 489.5 2893Met Target
Lowest Performing 466.7 473.8 7.1 472.0 534Exceeded Target
High needs 482.1 485.5 3.4 484.1 1854Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 482.9 486.3 3.4 484.5 1564Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 474.3 476.3 2.0 476.1 823Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 487.9 489.6 1.7 490.0 2573Met Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 483.9 484.6 0.7 485.7 2952Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 460.4 465.5 5.1 463.7 554Exceeded Target
High needs 478.2 479.5 1.3 480.1 1902Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 479.5 480.3 0.8 480.9 1612Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 468.3 471.3 3.0 470.4 834Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 484.8 484.8 0.0 487.1 2621No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 60.7 66.3 5.6 63.6 784Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 51.9 63.2 11.3 55.0 514Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 52.1 64.9 12.8 54.6 374Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 60.1 67.2 7.1 63.3 644Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.6 50.0 2202Below Target
Lowest Performing 48.0 50.0 532Below Target
High needs 46.0 50.0 1402Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.5 50.0 1202Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 43.2 50.0 602Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 45.6 50.0 1932Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.4 50.0 2272Below Target
Lowest Performing 47.6 50.0 542Below Target
High needs 47.4 50.0 1452Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.4 50.0 1252Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 47.6 50.0 602Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 48.9 50.0 1992Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 17.1 12.7 4.4 15.2 3234Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 24.6 14.5 10.1 19.9 554Exceeded Target
High needs 22.1 16.3 5.8 19.8 2154Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 22.2 17.2 5.0 19.8 1634Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 26.7 17.6 9.1 22.4 914Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 17.1 13.4 3.7 14.5 2834Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 313 29895Yes 1 313 30798Yes 1 87 8395Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 206 19295Yes 2 206 20097Yes 1 58 5496Yes 2
Econ. Disadvantaged 175 16395Yes 2 175 17198Yes 1 43 4096Yes 2
EL and Former EL 9---- 9---- 4----
Students w/ disabilities 88 8495Yes 1 88 8597Yes 1 24 2295Yes 2
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 2---- 2---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 4---- 4---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 23 1987No 2 23 23100Yes 1 8----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 10---- 10---- 7----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 274 26597Yes 1 274 27099Yes 1 70 6796Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles