Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Franklin

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Franklin

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Newton (02070000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Franklin (02070055)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
84% - Meeting targets85

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement24----
Achievement total101267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-24-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total7822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total1410.00410.0
Weighted total8.410.3-6.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 82%-86%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage84%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement24-
Achievement total101267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total8.110.3-
Percentage of possible points 79%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage79%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 91

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 506.4 511.9 5.5 508.1 2204Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 484.1 491.7 7.6 488.0 344Exceeded Target
High needs 495.9 504.5 8.6 497.5 854Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 492.2 497.1 4.9 493.8 254Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 506.8 516.5 9.7 508.2 324Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 491.1 496.0 4.9 492.4 534Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 511.4 520.8 9.4 513.3 314Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 508.1 512.4 4.3 509.7 1504Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 507.4 509.6 2.2 508.6 2204Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 479.0 484.8 5.8 481.8 344Exceeded Target
High needs 496.5 501.9 5.4 497.9 854Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 491.1 491.5 0.4 492.1 252Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 513.8 515.0 1.2 515.4 324Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 488.6 494.1 5.5 490.4 534Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 516.5 518.7 2.2 518.9 314Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 507.6 510.2 2.6 508.9 1504Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 82.2 82.5 0.3 84.4 632Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 69.8 70.5 0.7 73.0 282Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 5--
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities---- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 84.0 84.7 0.7 86.1 442Improved Below Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 60.9 50.0 1334Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 49.9 50.0 342Below Target
High needs 56.2 50.0 533Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 18--
EL and Former EL 66.8 50.0 204Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 51.4 50.0 323Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian 69.0 50.0 214Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 61.0 50.0 874Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.7 50.0 1333Met Target
Lowest Performing 50.6 50.0 343Met Target
High needs 53.2 50.0 533Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 18--
EL and Former EL 55.4 50.0 203Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 56.4 50.0 323Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian 64.7 50.0 214Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 55.2 50.0 873Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.9 5.1 -0.2 3.9 3741No Change
Lowest Performing 8.6 17.6 -9.0 5.4 340Declined
High needs 7.6 9.5 -1.9 5.6 1260Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 21.9 20.0 1.9 17.7 302Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 7.1 5.5 1.6 3.0 552Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 8.5 8.5 0.0 5.8 711No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 2.0 4.1 -2.1 0.0 493Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 34--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 5.5 4.2 1.3 4.4 2593Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 222 222100Yes 1 222 222100Yes 1 63 63100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 85 85100Yes 1 85 85100Yes 1 28 28100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 25 25100Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1 5----
EL and Former EL 32 32100Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1 9----
Students w/ disabilities 54 54100Yes 1 54 54100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Asian 31 31100Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1 7----
Afr. Amer./Black 9---- 9---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 16---- 16---- 6----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 12---- 12---- 5----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 0----
White 151 151100Yes 1 151 151100Yes 1 44 44100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles