Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Medfield Senior High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Medfield Senior High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Medfield (01750000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Medfield Senior High (01750505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
School of Recognition: High Achievement
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
87% - Meeting targets96

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-34-
Science achievement44-34-
Achievement total121247.5101267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth44-24-
Growth total7822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total111220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-34-
Advanced coursework completion34----
Additional indicators total7810.03410.0
Weighted total10.210.7-8.010.3-
Percentage of possible points 95%-78%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage87%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total111247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34-
Extended engagement rate04-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total71220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total2810.0
Weighted total8.210.7-
Percentage of possible points 77%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage77%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 93

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.5 99.4 -0.1 100.0 2084Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 100.0 99.5 -0.5 100.0 524Exceeded Target
High needs 95.8 96.4 0.6 97.4 353Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.9 99.6 -0.3 100.0 1854Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.2 98.9 0.7 99.7 2074Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 93.9 96.2 2.3 95.9 523Met Target
High needs 86.5 94.3 7.8 88.7 354Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.0 99.5 1.5 99.6 1844Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.1 98.8 0.7 99.5 2044Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 94.3 96.6 2.3 96.4 523Met Target
High needs 91.0 94.7 3.7 93.3 334Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.1 99.2 1.1 99.5 1824Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 53.6 50.0 1993Met Target
Lowest Performing 43.0 50.0 522Below Target
High needs 56.4 50.0 333Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 15--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 53.5 50.0 1783Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 60.0 50.0 1994Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 47.7 50.0 512Below Target
High needs 59.8 50.0 333Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 15--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 60.6 50.0 1784Exceeded Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.3 98.6 0.3 99.5 2194Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 90.9 93.6 2.7 94.1 473Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 21--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 31--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.1 99.0 0.9 99.5 1934Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 100.0 98.7 -1.3 100.0 2343Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 100.0 93.2 -6.8 100.0 440Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 12--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 33--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 98.6 -1.4 100.0 2143Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.2 0.1 0.1 1.0 8414Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 1.8 0.9 0.9 1.6 1134Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 32--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 87--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 46--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 0.3 0.1 0.2 1.0 7474Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.8 5.2 0.6 4.8 8334Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 7.5 7.7 -0.2 2.2 523Met Target
High needs 12.6 11.6 1.0 9.9 1292Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 46--
EL and Former EL---- 17--
Students w/ disabilities---- 77--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 49--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 22--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 5.9 5.2 0.7 4.6 7304Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 92.0 90.5 -1.5 95.2 4203Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 55.6 53.4 -2.2 63.6 580Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 22--
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities---- 36--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 28--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 92.6 91.3 -1.3 95.6 3663Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 209 209100Yes 1 209 208100Yes 1 209 209100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 36 36100Yes 1 36 36100Yes 1 36 36100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 16---- 16---- 16----
EL and Former EL 3---- 3---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 21 21100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 11---- 11---- 11----
Afr. Amer./Black 2---- 2---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 7---- 7---- 7----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 4---- 4---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 185 185100Yes 1 185 18499Yes 1 185 185100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles