Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Turkey Hill Elementary School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Turkey Hill Elementary School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Lunenburg (01620000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Turkey Hill Elementary School (01620025)
GRADES SERVED
03,04,05
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
71% - Partially meeting targets44

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement24-44-
Science achievement04----
Achievement total61267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total5822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-34-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.03410.0
Weighted total5.510.3-6.87.6-
Percentage of possible points 53%-89%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage71%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement14-
Achievement total51267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total2410.0
Weighted total4.510.3-
Percentage of possible points 44%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage44%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 30

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 495.2 499.2 4.0 496.7 3614Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 474.7 481.0 6.3 480.2 594Exceeded Target
High needs 484.2 488.2 4.0 486.0 1094Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 487.9 491.8 3.9 489.2 654Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities 476.2 480.4 4.2 478.0 594Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino 487.4 492.6 5.2 488.9 274Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 495.8 499.6 3.8 497.5 3104Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 498.5 498.9 0.4 500.0 3592Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 475.1 480.6 5.5 478.1 594Exceeded Target
High needs 488.1 486.4 -1.7 489.7 1080Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 493.2 489.7 -3.5 494.2 650Declined
EL and Former EL---- 11--
Students w/ disabilities 479.2 478.3 -0.9 481.0 590Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino 488.6 489.3 0.7 490.2 262Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 499.6 499.9 0.3 501.3 3092Improved Below Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 81.3 76.9 -4.4 84.0 1210Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 67.1 66.9 -0.2 70.5 371No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 76.1 74.0 -2.1 79.9 241No Change
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 54.5 59.5 5.0 57.5 214Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 82.0 78.4 -3.6 84.8 1020Declined

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 41.9 50.0 2462Below Target
Lowest Performing 45.1 50.0 592Below Target
High needs 40.5 50.0 722Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 40.3 50.0 472Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 38.8 50.0 351Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 41.7 50.0 2132Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.9 50.0 2453Met Target
Lowest Performing 52.0 50.0 593Met Target
High needs 45.8 50.0 722Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.9 50.0 472Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 42.2 50.0 352Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 51.2 50.0 2123Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.1 4.2 0.9 3.8 3803Met Target
Lowest Performing 6.5 3.4 3.1 2.6 593Met Target
High needs 10.1 9.3 0.8 7.8 1182Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.6 12.3 1.3 10.5 572Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 16--
Students w/ disabilities 8.8 6.8 2.0 5.0 592Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino 10.0 9.7 0.3 6.3 312Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 4.5 3.7 0.8 2.8 3233Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 367 367100Yes 1 367 36599Yes 1 123 123100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 114 114100Yes 1 114 11399Yes 1 39 39100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 68 68100Yes 1 68 68100Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 14---- 14---- 6----
Students w/ disabilities 61 61100Yes 1 61 61100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 3---- 3---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 3---- 3---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 28 28100Yes 1 28 2796Yes 1 13----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 16---- 16---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 2---- 2---- 0----
White 315 315100Yes 1 315 314100Yes 1 104 104100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles