Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Remington Middle

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Remington Middle

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Franklin (01010000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Remington Middle (01010310)
GRADES SERVED
06,07,08
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-04-
Mathematics achievement34-24-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total91267.52867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total5822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.00410.0
Weighted total7.510.3-2.37.6-
Percentage of possible points 73%-30%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage52%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total111267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total9.010.3-
Percentage of possible points 87%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage87%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 37

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 502.9 503.0 0.1 504.4 4372Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 482.2 480.3 -1.9 487.7 720Declined
High needs 485.7 487.8 2.1 487.5 1333Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 490.4 493.2 2.8 491.7 574Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities 480.2 481.2 1.0 482.0 952Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 520.9 522.3 1.4 522.7 234Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 502.4 502.3 -0.1 504.1 3851No Change

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 506.2 507.6 1.4 507.7 4363Met Target
Lowest Performing 484.1 484.6 0.5 487.1 722Improved Below Target
High needs 488.1 493.1 5.0 489.7 1324Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 491.4 494.8 3.4 492.4 574Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities 484.0 486.3 2.3 485.8 943Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 531.0 530.8 -0.2 533.8 234Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.4 507.1 1.7 507.1 3853Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 70.2 76.3 6.1 72.9 1524Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 51.1 58.5 7.4 54.5 474Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.2 60.2 9.0 55.0 224Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 47.7 53.9 6.2 50.7 324Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 68.9 75.4 6.5 71.7 1344Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 48.2 50.0 4292Below Target
Lowest Performing 48.3 50.0 722Below Target
High needs 48.6 50.0 1282Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 50.6 50.0 543Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 17--
Students w/ disabilities 46.9 50.0 922Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 59.4 50.0 233Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino-- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 47.4 50.0 3772Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.9 50.0 4253Met Target
Lowest Performing 49.5 50.0 712Below Target
High needs 51.6 50.0 1243Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 47.7 50.0 522Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 17--
Students w/ disabilities 50.8 50.0 883Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 58.2 50.0 233Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 52.0 50.0 3743Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 9.3 8.5 0.8 8.0 4473Met Target
Lowest Performing 20.8 29.2 -8.4 16.9 720Declined
High needs 19.5 16.0 3.5 17.2 1314Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 28.8 23.4 5.4 25.7 474Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities 17.6 16.8 0.8 13.8 952Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 4.0 0.0 4.0 0.9 234Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 0--
White 8.7 7.9 0.8 7.0 3942Improved Below Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 446 446100Yes 1 446 446100Yes 1 153 153100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 136 136100Yes 1 136 136100Yes 1 48 48100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 58 58100Yes 1 59 59100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 19---- 19---- 6----
Students w/ disabilities 96 96100Yes 1 95 95100Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 23 23100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1 7----
Afr. Amer./Black 7---- 6---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 12---- 12---- 6----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 11---- 11---- 5----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 1----
White 392 392100Yes 1 393 393100Yes 1 134 134100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles