Massachusetts School and District Profiles

James M. Quinn School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - James M. Quinn School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Dartmouth (00720000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
James M. Quinn School (00720040)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement04-34-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total71267.57867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.00410.0
Weighted total6.410.3-6.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 62%-80%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage71%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement24-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total101267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total3410.0
Weighted total8.410.3-
Percentage of possible points 82%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage82%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 74

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 497.5 501.7 4.2 499.0 3334Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 473.1 483.4 10.3 477.8 504Exceeded Target
High needs 487.8 494.9 7.1 489.4 1394Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 490.1 495.6 5.5 491.5 874Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 487.5 501.1 13.6 489.5 234Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 478.0 486.9 8.9 479.7 704Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 497.9 501.3 3.4 499.5 2924Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 501.8 500.5 -1.3 503.2 3330Declined
Lowest Performing 479.3 482.4 3.1 482.9 503Met Target
High needs 494.3 494.8 0.5 496.0 1392Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 494.3 494.3 0.0 495.4 871No Change
EL and Former EL 494.9 501.6 6.7 497.1 234Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 487.0 489.5 2.5 489.1 703Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 501.3 500.3 -1.0 502.8 2920Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 74.6 77.7 3.1 77.0 1213Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 61.4 67.3 5.9 64.2 524Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 62.9 71.8 8.9 65.8 314Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities 52.3 53.8 1.5 55.4 262Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 74.8 76.7 1.9 77.2 1043Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 58.3 50.0 2183Met Target
Lowest Performing 57.4 50.0 503Met Target
High needs 55.7 50.0 833Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 52.3 50.0 533Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 18--
Students w/ disabilities 52.7 50.0 403Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 57.7 50.0 1953Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 54.3 50.0 2173Met Target
Lowest Performing 56.1 50.0 493Met Target
High needs 51.7 50.0 823Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.8 50.0 523Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 18--
Students w/ disabilities 49.2 50.0 392Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 54.1 50.0 1943Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.5 3.9 0.6 3.4 5363Met Target
Lowest Performing 5.9 8.0 -2.1 2.3 500Declined
High needs 9.5 7.0 2.5 7.1 2283Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.1 6.1 5.0 7.6 1314Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 7.3 5.4 1.9 2.9 372Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 9.6 8.5 1.1 6.3 1062Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 36--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 4.3 3.7 0.6 3.0 4613Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 339 339100Yes 1 339 339100Yes 1 121 121100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 145 145100Yes 1 145 145100Yes 1 52 52100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 92 92100Yes 1 92 92100Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 25 25100Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1 15----
Students w/ disabilities 73 73100Yes 1 73 73100Yes 1 26 26100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 5---- 5---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 4---- 4---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 13---- 13---- 4----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 8----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 1----
White 296 296100Yes 1 296 296100Yes 1 104 104100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles