Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Joseph Demello

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Joseph Demello

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Dartmouth (00720000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Joseph Demello (00720015)
GRADES SERVED
01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
51% - Partially meeting targets56

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-34-
Mathematics achievement04-24-
Science achievement14----
Achievement total41267.55867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total4822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.04410.0
Weighted total4.010.3-4.77.6-
Percentage of possible points 39%-62%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage51%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement24-
Achievement total51267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total3822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total4.510.3-
Percentage of possible points 44%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage44%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 50

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 502.4 504.1 1.7 503.9 2613Met Target
Lowest Performing 480.3 484.8 4.5 485.0 403Met Target
High needs 490.9 492.5 1.6 492.5 973Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 494.0 494.4 0.4 495.4 592Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 21--
Students w/ disabilities 483.7 485.6 1.9 485.4 493Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 503.1 505.0 1.9 504.7 2363Met Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 501.7 498.7 -3.0 503.1 2600Declined
Lowest Performing 477.2 479.4 2.2 480.8 402Improved Below Target
High needs 489.6 488.6 -1.0 491.3 960Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 492.8 489.5 -3.3 493.9 580Declined
EL and Former EL---- 21--
Students w/ disabilities 481.4 484.5 3.1 483.5 494Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 502.3 499.5 -2.8 503.8 2360Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 79.3 78.6 -0.7 81.7 981No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 66.9 67.4 0.5 69.7 362Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 80.8 81.7 0.9 83.2 902Improved Below Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.1 50.0 1742Below Target
Lowest Performing 41.3 50.0 402Below Target
High needs 39.6 50.0 661Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 40.9 50.0 382Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 35.7 50.0 341Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 46.9 50.0 1572Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 44.6 50.0 1732Below Target
Lowest Performing 46.6 50.0 402Below Target
High needs 42.7 50.0 662Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 36.4 50.0 381Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 45.3 50.0 342Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 46.4 50.0 1562Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 2.4 2.3 0.1 1.3 4424Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 2.4 0.0 2.4 0.0 404Exceeded Target
High needs 2.7 2.9 -0.2 0.3 1724Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.4 3.4 -2.0 0.0 893Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 37--
Students w/ disabilities 3.0 2.6 0.4 0.0 774Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 26--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 2.1 1.5 0.6 0.8 3904Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 268 268100Yes 1 268 267100Yes 1 98 98100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 97 97100Yes 1 97 9699Yes 1 36 36100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 59 59100Yes 1 59 5898Yes 1 17----
EL and Former EL 21 21100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1 7----
Students w/ disabilities 49 49100Yes 1 49 49100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 1---- 1---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 3---- 3---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 10---- 10---- 1----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 13---- 13---- 6----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 241 241100Yes 1 241 241100Yes 1 90 90100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles