Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Gen John J Stefanik

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Gen John J Stefanik

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Chicopee (00610000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Gen John J Stefanik (00610090)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
46% - Partially meeting targets42

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-44-
Mathematics achievement04-24-
Science achievement04----
Achievement total01260.06867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-34-
Mathematics growth24-34-
Growth total4820.06822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total4410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-34-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.03410.0
Weighted total1.59.6-5.77.6-
Percentage of possible points 16%-75%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage46%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement24-
Achievement total21267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total3410.0
Weighted total2.610.3-
Percentage of possible points 25%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage25%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 74

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 504.5 502.8 -1.7 506.2 1890Declined
Lowest Performing 483.6 488.7 5.1 487.5 264Exceeded Target
High needs 502.4 501.6 -0.8 504.0 1630Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 502.9 501.7 -1.2 504.5 1580Declined
EL and Former EL 491.0 490.1 -0.9 492.4 350Declined
Students w/ disabilities 484.8 484.3 -0.5 486.1 341No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino 503.3 501.4 -1.9 504.7 1390Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 509.5 503.1 -6.4 511.1 320Declined

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 505.0 498.1 -6.9 506.2 1890Declined
Lowest Performing 488.2 489.0 0.8 491.0 262Improved Below Target
High needs 503.0 496.9 -6.1 504.4 1630Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 503.3 497.2 -6.1 504.3 1580Declined
EL and Former EL 496.8 488.2 -8.6 498.4 350Declined
Students w/ disabilities 494.5 482.5 -12.0 496.3 340Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino 504.2 496.9 -7.3 506.1 1390Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 508.8 500.5 -8.3 510.1 320Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 76.9 73.0 -3.9 79.1 640Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 71.3 73.2 1.9 74.5 562Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 70.3 73.6 3.3 73.2 553Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 11--
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino 74.4 73.0 -1.4 83.6 491No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 9--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 48.1 50.0 1252Below Target
Lowest Performing 50.5 50.0 263Met Target
High needs 48.0 50.0 1132Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 48.4 50.0 1112Below Target
EL and Former EL 44.6 50.0 242Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 51.0 50.0 213Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino 48.3 50.0 1002Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 16--

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.0 50.0 1252Below Target
Lowest Performing 54.0 50.0 263Met Target
High needs 49.0 50.0 1132Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 49.0 50.0 1112Below Target
EL and Former EL 46.9 50.0 242Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 42.7 50.0 212Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino 48.0 50.0 1002Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 16--

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 80.0 75.8 -4.2 45.3 334Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 80.0 75.8 -4.2 45.3 334Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 18.5 17.7 0.8 17.5 3683Met Target
Lowest Performing 29.6 26.9 2.7 26.4 263Met Target
High needs 21.1 19.6 1.5 19.1 3123Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 21.9 20.3 1.6 17.7 2712Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 27.1 17.9 9.2 23.0 674Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 23.2 17.5 5.7 20.5 634Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 28--
Hispanic/Latino 21.9 19.1 2.8 17.9 2562Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 6.7 9.3 -2.6 5.6 750Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 206 206100Yes 1 205 205100Yes 1 72 72100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 179 179100Yes 1 178 178100Yes 1 64 64100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 173 173100Yes 1 172 172100Yes 1 63 63100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 45 45100Yes 1 44 44100Yes 1 16----
Students w/ disabilities 38 38100Yes 1 38 38100Yes 1 15----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 2---- 2---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 10---- 9---- 5----
Hispanic/Latino 152 152100Yes 1 152 152100Yes 1 56 56100Yes 1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 7---- 7---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 35 35100Yes 1 35 35100Yes 1 10----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles