Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Ruth Batson Academy

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Boston Community Leadership Academy

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Boston (00350000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Boston Community Leadership Academy (00350558)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement34-14-
Achievement total101240.091290.0
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24----
Mathematics growth34----
Growth total5820.0---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04----
Extended engagement rate04----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total41220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total1410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion04----
Additional indicators total0810.00410.0
Weighted total5.910.0-8.111.2-
Percentage of possible points 59%-72%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage66%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total111247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate04-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total41220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total0810.0
Weighted total7.210.7-
Percentage of possible points 67%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage67%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 51

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 90.9 93.2 2.3 92.6 1113Met Target
Lowest Performing 73.0 90.9 17.9 75.7 224Exceeded Target
High needs 89.5 92.0 2.5 91.7 943Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 90.0 93.2 3.2 91.8 744Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 85.5 86.5 1.0 88.5 522Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black 89.6 94.6 5.0 92.2 374Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 90.6 91.9 1.3 92.6 623Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 3--

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 86.0 92.3 6.3 88.2 1114Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 57.0 73.9 16.9 59.5 224Exceeded Target
High needs 83.4 91.2 7.8 85.8 944Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 85.0 92.9 7.9 87.5 744Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 76.0 88.0 12.0 81.1 524Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black 91.7 91.2 -0.5 96.6 371No Change
Hispanic/Latino 80.7 91.5 10.8 83.9 624Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 3--

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 75.2 76.9 1.7 77.7 943Met Target
Lowest Performing 58.0 55.7 -2.3 61.0 221No Change
High needs 72.9 76.6 3.7 75.2 794Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 73.1 78.6 5.5 76.0 634Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 68.9 66.0 -2.9 72.2 390Declined
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black 78.0 75.0 -3.0 81.2 300Declined
Hispanic/Latino 73.5 75.9 2.4 77.5 532Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 3--

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 45.0 50.0 852Below Target
Lowest Performing-- 19--
High needs 48.1 50.0 692Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.0 50.0 542Below Target
EL and Former EL 50.9 50.0 333Met Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black 48.5 50.0 262Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 44.5 50.0 492Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 2--

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 59.0 50.0 843Met Target
Lowest Performing-- 18--
High needs 58.1 50.0 683Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 58.0 50.0 533Met Target
EL and Former EL 62.5 50.0 324Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black 53.7 50.0 263Met Target
Hispanic/Latino 62.0 50.0 484Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 2--

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 89.3 81.7 -7.6 93.1 1310Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 89.2 81.7 -7.5 93.3 1260Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 89.8 81.4 -8.4 94.7 1180Declined
EL and Former EL 86.8 68.4 -18.4 92.8 380Declined
Students w/ disabilities---- 32--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black 91.5 80.9 -10.6 97.8 470Declined
Hispanic/Latino 87.5 84.6 -2.9 92.6 650Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 12--

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 94.5 93.4 -1.1 97.6 1220Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 95.2 93.7 -1.5 99.9 1110Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 95.0 94.4 -0.6 99.9 1080Declined
EL and Former EL 90.0 94.7 4.7 95.4 382Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities---- 23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black 95.1 91.5 -3.6 99.9 470Declined
Hispanic/Latino 94.3 94.6 0.3 99.8 562Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 12--

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 1.8 1.2 0.6 1.6 4964Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 1.9 1.3 0.6 1.7 3824Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.0 1.4 0.6 1.8 2774Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 5.3 1.7 3.6 4.8 1214Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities---- 106--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 23--
Afr. Amer./Black 0.5 1.1 -0.6 1.0 1790Declined
Hispanic/Latino 0.8 1.2 -0.4 1.0 2540Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 29--

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 54.6 25.5 -29.1 38.8 941No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 54.6 25.5 -29.1 38.8 941No Change
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 31.0 35.0 -4.0 28.6 4720Declined
Lowest Performing 32.0 36.4 -4.4 22.4 220Declined
High needs 32.8 37.6 -4.8 29.6 3800Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 35.3 40.4 -5.1 32.0 2650Declined
EL and Former EL 29.2 37.4 -8.2 24.2 2060Declined
Students w/ disabilities---- 103--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 25--
Afr. Amer./Black 27.8 28.3 -0.5 23.4 1661No Change
Hispanic/Latino 33.9 39.2 -5.3 30.0 2450Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 26--

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 66.8 49.3 -17.5 72.9 2230Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 56.9 37.5 -19.4 63.2 1680Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 57.0 40.8 -16.2 63.5 1300Declined
EL and Former EL 67.4 43.6 -23.8 71.6 780Declined
Students w/ disabilities---- 60--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black 59.6 44.0 -15.6 68.8 840Declined
Hispanic/Latino 72.0 50.5 -21.5 79.5 1050Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 12--

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 113 113100Yes 1 113 113100Yes 1 113 113100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 95 95100Yes 1 95 95100Yes 1 95 95100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 75 75100Yes 1 75 75100Yes 1 75 75100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 53 53100Yes 1 53 53100Yes 1 53 53100Yes 1
Students w/ disabilities 19---- 19---- 19----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 8---- 8---- 8----
Afr. Amer./Black 37 37100Yes 1 37 37100Yes 1 37 37100Yes 1
Hispanic/Latino 63 63100Yes 1 63 63100Yes 1 63 63100Yes 1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 1---- 1---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 4---- 4---- 4----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles