Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Russell Elementary School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - William E Russell

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Boston (00350000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
William E Russell (00350366)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
57% - Partially meeting targets21

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-44-
Mathematics achievement04-24-
Science achievement24----
Achievement total51260.06867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-44-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total5820.06822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total1410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total4.19.6-5.47.6-
Percentage of possible points 43%-71%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage57%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement14-
Achievement total31267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total3.210.3-
Percentage of possible points 31%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage31%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 38

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 492.6 494.4 1.8 494.6 1553Met Target
Lowest Performing 471.5 484.8 13.3 476.8 204Exceeded Target
High needs 491.5 492.6 1.1 493.5 1372Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 491.7 491.8 0.1 493.3 952Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 491.8 492.7 0.9 493.4 972Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities---- 20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 20--
Afr. Amer./Black 494.4 495.1 0.7 496.0 572Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 489.8 490.0 0.2 491.5 752Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 2--

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 493.1 489.4 -3.7 494.9 1550Declined
Lowest Performing 470.3 471.6 1.3 473.6 202Improved Below Target
High needs 492.0 487.8 -4.2 493.9 1370Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 492.0 487.4 -4.6 493.4 950Declined
EL and Former EL 494.1 488.8 -5.3 495.9 970Declined
Students w/ disabilities---- 20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 20--
Afr. Amer./Black 493.2 488.3 -4.9 495.0 570Declined
Hispanic/Latino 490.0 485.7 -4.3 491.6 750Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 2--

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 64.2 65.7 1.5 67.1 432Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 64.4 62.1 -2.3 67.5 351No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 24--
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities---- 5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 20--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 1--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 56.3 50.0 983Met Target
Lowest Performing 61.6 50.0 204Exceeded Target
High needs 56.8 50.0 863Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 56.9 50.0 553Met Target
EL and Former EL 57.1 50.0 593Met Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 13--
Afr. Amer./Black 54.2 50.0 393Met Target
Hispanic/Latino 57.6 50.0 433Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 2--

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 42.5 50.0 982Below Target
Lowest Performing 40.3 50.0 202Below Target
High needs 41.1 50.0 862Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 44.6 50.0 552Below Target
EL and Former EL 38.0 50.0 591Below Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 13--
Afr. Amer./Black 47.6 50.0 392Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 34.9 50.0 431Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 2--

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 70.8 65.9 -4.9 78.2 1381No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 70.8 65.9 -4.9 78.2 1381No Change
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 14.0 23.1 -9.1 12.1 2900Declined
Lowest Performing 19.0 35.0 -16.0 14.3 200Declined
High needs 15.5 24.1 -8.6 13.2 2570Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 23.7 28.5 -4.8 21.3 1860Declined
EL and Former EL 12.2 19.3 -7.1 8.5 1920Declined
Students w/ disabilities---- 31--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 32--
Afr. Amer./Black 7.1 19.4 -12.3 3.2 930Declined
Hispanic/Latino 21.0 30.3 -9.3 17.6 1550Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White---- 3--

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 161 161100Yes 1 161 161100Yes 1 47 47100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 143 143100Yes 1 143 143100Yes 1 39 39100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 101 101100Yes 1 101 101100Yes 1 28 28100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 101 101100Yes 1 101 101100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1
Students w/ disabilities 22 22100Yes 1 22 22100Yes 1 6----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 5----
Afr. Amer./Black 60 60100Yes 1 60 60100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1
Hispanic/Latino 78 78100Yes 1 78 78100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 2---- 2---- 1----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles