Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Stoneham High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2017
View Next Year
print page

2017 Official Accountability Data - Stoneham High
Organization Information
District:Stoneham (02840000)School type:High School
School:Stoneham High (02840505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2017
2017 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2016 CPI 2017 CPI CPI Change 2017 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 99.1, Target = 98.2CPI = 99.1, Target = 98.2 96.3 98.7 99.1 0.4 98.2 98.2 69169100Above Target
High needsCPI = 95.8, Target = 94CPI = 95.8, Target = 94CPI = 95.8, Target = 94 88.0 95.3 95.8 0.5 94.0 94.0 5836100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilities -------20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 99.2, Target = 98.5CPI = 99.2, Target = 98.5 97.0 100.0 99.2 -0.8 98.5 98.5 64151100Above Target
Summary > 2017
2017 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2016 CPI 2017 CPI CPI Change 2017 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.7, Target = 96.2CPI = 94.7, Target = 96.2CPI = 94.7, Target = 96.2 92.4 94.5 94.7 0.2 96.2 96.2 6316650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 82.9, Target = 90.5CPI = 82.9, Target = 90.5CPI = 82.9, Target = 90.5 80.9 82.5 82.9 0.4 90.5 90.5 493550Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.1, Target = 96.4CPI = 95.1, Target = 96.4CPI = 95.1, Target = 96.4 92.8 96.7 95.1 -1.6 96.4 96.4 5614825No Change
Summary > 2017
2017 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2016 CPI 2017 CPI CPI Change 2017 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.2, Target = 95.8CPI = 95.2, Target = 95.8 91.5 94.9 95.2 0.3 95.8 95.8 6916075On Target
High needsCPI = 84.4, Target = 87.5CPI = 84.4, Target = 87.5CPI = 84.4, Target = 87.5 75.0 86.2 84.4 -1.8 87.5 87.5 573225No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.3, Target = 96.2CPI = 95.3, Target = 96.2 92.3 96.3 95.3 -1.0 96.2 96.2 6214475On Target
Summary > 2017
2017 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016
% Advanced		 2017
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2016
% Warning/Failing		 2017
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 78.5 70.41690 1.3 0.016925
High needs 53.5 25.0360 4.7 0.03625
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 83.9 72.21510 0.0 0.015125
Summary > 2017
2017 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016
% Advanced		 2017
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2016
% Warning/Failing		 2017
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 67.8 60.21660 4.1 3.616625
High needs 30.0 25.7350 12.5 14.3350
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 70.5 60.81480 1.6 3.41480
Summary > 2017
2017 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016
% Advanced		 2017
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2016
% Warning/Failing		 2017
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 55.6 49.41600 2.1 1.316025
High needs 23.7 28.13225 7.9 3.13225
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 54.2 49.31440 0.8 1.41440
Summary > 2017
2017 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2016 SGP 2017 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 51 83.0 61.5 -21.5 51.0Yes152100Above Target
High needsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 70.0 52.0 -18.0 51.0No3275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 85.0 61.0 -24.0 51.0No137100Above Target
Summary > 2017
2017 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2016 SGP 2017 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 47.0 41.0 -6.0 51.0No15250Below Target
High needsSGP = 36.5, Target = 51SGP = 36.5, Target = 51SGP = 36.5, Target = 51 44.0 36.5 -7.5 51.0No3225Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51 47.0 41.5 -5.5 51.0No13650Below Target
Summary > 2017
2017 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2017 SGPA 2017 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.09-
High needs- 60.09-
EL and Former EL- 60.09-
Summary > 2017
2016 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 Rate 2016 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 94.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.6, Target = 80 95.8 94.6 -1.2 80.0 90.014975On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 92.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.2, Target = 80 87.9 92.2 4.3 80.0 90.06475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.034--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.02--
Asian --- 80.0 90.07--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.04--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.04--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.03--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.01--
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 94.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.5, Target = 80 95.7 94.5 -1.2 80.0 90.012875On Target
Summary > 2017
2015 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 96.4, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.4, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.4, Target = 85 96.7 96.4 -0.3 85.0 95.0165100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 89.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.7, Target = 85 91.2 89.7 -1.5 85.0 95.05875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.02--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.027--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.09--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.06--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.09--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.02--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 96.4, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.4, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.4, Target = 85 98.8 96.4 -2.4 85.0 95.0139100Above Target
Summary > 2017
2016 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2015 Rate 2016 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.9, Target = 0.2 0.3 1.0 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.25464225No Change
High needsDropout Rate = 3.5, Target = 0.5 1.0 2.2 3.5 -1.3 0.5 0.5311430Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------56--
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilities -------84--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------22--
Afr. Amer./Black -------17--
Hispanic/Latino -------28--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.9, Target = 0.2 0.3 0.9 0.9 0.0 0.2 0.24656025No Change
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2016 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2017
2017 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target Enrolled Assessed % Met Target Enrolled Assessed % Met Target
All students17717699Yes17717398Yes17717398Yes
High needs414098Yes413995Yes413995Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged232296Yes232296Yes232296Yes
EL and Former EL9---9---9---
Students w/ disabilities222195Yes222091No222091No
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4---4---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---6---
Hispanic/Latino10---10---10---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White154154100Yes15415198Yes15415198Yes

NOTE: In 2017, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2017 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2017 participation rate was lower than 95 percent (high schools) or 90 percent (schools and districts administering Next-Generation MCAS test in grades 3-8) for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2017 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles