Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Stoneham High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Stoneham High
Organization Information
District:Stoneham (02840000)School type:High School
School:Stoneham High (02840505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 98.7, Target = 97.8CPI = 98.7, Target = 97.8 96.3 99.3 98.7 -0.6 97.8 98.2 63149100Above Target
High needsCPI = 95.3, Target = 93CPI = 95.3, Target = 93CPI = 95.3, Target = 93 88.0 97.1 95.3 -1.8 93.0 94.0 5443100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 100, Target = 98.3CPI = 100, Target = 98.3CPI = 100, Target = 98.3 97.0 99.2 100.0 0.8 98.3 98.5 97124100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.5, Target = 95.6CPI = 94.5, Target = 95.6CPI = 94.5, Target = 95.6 92.4 96.6 94.5 -2.1 95.6 96.2 6414675On Target
High needsCPI = 82.5, Target = 88.9CPI = 82.5, Target = 88.9CPI = 82.5, Target = 88.9 80.9 87.1 82.5 -4.6 88.9 90.5 51400Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.7, Target = 95.8CPI = 96.7, Target = 95.8 92.8 97.2 96.7 -0.5 95.8 96.4 7112275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.9, Target = 95CPI = 94.9, Target = 95 91.5 95.7 94.9 -0.8 95.0 95.8 7014275On Target
High needsCPI = 86.2, Target = 85.4CPI = 86.2, Target = 85.4 75.0 84.6 86.2 1.6 85.4 87.5 603875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.3, Target = 95.5CPI = 96.3, Target = 95.5 92.3 96.5 96.3 -0.2 95.5 96.2 7012075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 77.2 78.51490 0.0 1.31490
High needs 40.0 53.54325 0.0 4.7430
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 78.6 83.91240 0.0 0.012425
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 70.1 67.81460 1.8 4.11460
High needs 22.9 30.04025 8.6 12.5400
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 70.8 70.51220 1.3 1.61220
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 51.8 55.61420 1.2 2.11420
High needs 17.6 23.73825 2.9 7.9380
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 53.6 54.21200 0.7 0.81200
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 83, Target = 51SGP = 83, Target = 51SGP = 83, Target = 51 75.0 83.0 8.0 51.0No130100Above Target
High needsSGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51 82.0 70.0 -12.0 51.0No34100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-18--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 85, Target = 51SGP = 85, Target = 51SGP = 85, Target = 51 73.0 85.0 12.0 51.0Yes113100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 43.0 47.0 4.0 51.0No12750Below Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 32.0 44.0 12.0 51.0No3175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-17--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 41.5 47.0 5.5 51.0No11150Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.07-
High needs- 60.07-
EL and Former EL- 60.07-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 95.8, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.8, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.8, Target = 80 95.6 95.8 0.2 80.0 90.0165100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 87.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 87.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 87.9, Target = 80 87.7 87.9 0.2 80.0 90.05875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.02--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.027--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.09--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.06--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.09--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.02--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 80 98.2 95.7 -2.5 80.0 90.0139100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 96.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.7, Target = 85 93.7 96.7 3.0 85.0 95.0183100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 91.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.2, Target = 85 84.4 91.2 6.8 85.0 95.05775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.04--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.027--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.05--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.05--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.02--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.02--
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 98.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 98.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 98.8, Target = 85 93.6 98.8 5.2 85.0 95.0167100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 1, Target = 0.2 0.3 1.3 1.0 0.3 0.2 0.25263125No Change
High needsDropout Rate = 2.2, Target = 0.6 1.0 4.0 2.2 1.8 0.6 0.54613850Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------58--
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilities -------91--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------25--
Afr. Amer./Black -------18--
Hispanic/Latino -------25--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.9, Target = 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.9 -0.1 0.2 0.24454825No Change
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students15215199Yes15214897Yes15214897Yes
High needs4444100Yes444196Yes444295Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged23---23---23---
EL and Former EL11---11---11---
Students w/ disabilities19---19---19---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian7---7---7---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---3---
Hispanic/Latino11---11---11---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---5---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White12612599Yes12612398Yes12612398Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles