Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Louise A Conley
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Louise A Conley
Organization Information
District:Whitman-Hanson (07800000)School type:Elementary School
School:Louise A Conley (07800010)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 74.2, Target = 89.6CPI = 74.2, Target = 89.6CPI = 74.2, Target = 89.6 82.1 74.3 74.2 -0.1 89.6 91.1 1427825No Change
High needsCPI = 58.2, Target = 80.8CPI = 58.2, Target = 80.8CPI = 58.2, Target = 80.8 67.0 63.1 58.2 -4.9 80.8 83.5 2910Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 66.7, Target = 70.9CPI = 66.7, Target = 70.9CPI = 66.7, Target = 70.9 68.2 68.2 66.7 -1.5 70.9 84.1 146325No Change
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 37.5, Target = 71.6CPI = 37.5, Target = 71.6CPI = 37.5, Target = 71.6 51.3 42.4 37.5 -4.9 71.6 75.7 2440Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 76, Target = 89.8CPI = 76, Target = 89.8CPI = 76, Target = 89.8 82.5 75.4 76.0 0.6 89.8 91.3 724850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.7, Target = 89.2CPI = 80.7, Target = 89.2CPI = 80.7, Target = 89.2 81.4 78.8 80.7 1.9 89.2 90.7 2927850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 63.3, Target = 83.4CPI = 63.3, Target = 83.4CPI = 63.3, Target = 83.4 71.5 67.4 63.3 -4.1 83.4 85.8 10920Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 67.1, Target = 75CPI = 67.1, Target = 75CPI = 67.1, Target = 75 72.7 72.7 67.1 -5.6 75.0 86.4 16630Declined
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 50, Target = 77.5CPI = 50, Target = 77.5CPI = 50, Target = 77.5 61.5 49.3 50.0 0.7 77.5 80.8 144550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 81.6, Target = 89.4CPI = 81.6, Target = 89.4CPI = 81.6, Target = 89.4 81.8 80.3 81.6 1.3 89.4 90.9 1924850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77.7, Target = 82.1CPI = 77.7, Target = 82.1CPI = 77.7, Target = 82.1 69.3 83.2 77.7 -5.5 82.1 84.7 39920Declined
High needsCPI = 69.7, Target = 77.7CPI = 69.7, Target = 77.7CPI = 69.7, Target = 77.7 61.8 75.8 69.7 -6.1 77.7 80.9 57330Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged  79.5---- 89.8-25--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 79.5, Target = 82.4CPI = 79.5, Target = 82.4CPI = 79.5, Target = 82.4 69.9 84.4 79.5 -4.9 82.4 85.0 27830Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 3.5 2.92780 13.6 15.82780
High needs 0.0 1.19125 26.7 34.1910
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 1.66325 24.2 25.4630
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0440 44.4 59.1440
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 3.9 2.82480 12.6 14.52480
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.8 23.427825 9.7 11.92780
High needs 9.3 8.7920 16.3 27.2920
Econ. Disadvantaged 12.1 12.7630 10.6 23.8630
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0450 33.3 40.0450
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.6 24.624825 8.6 11.32480
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.7 6.5920 2.1 7.6920
High needs 6.7 0.0330 3.3 12.1330
Econ. Disadvantaged--25---25-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.9 7.2830 1.2 7.2830
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 30.0 36.0 6.0 51.0No16750Below Target
High needsSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 25.0 36.0 11.0 51.0No5675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51 25.0 42.5 17.5 51.0No38100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 30.0 37.0 7.0 51.0No14950Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51 36.0 41.5 5.5 51.0Yes16875On Target
High needsSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 38.5 38.0 -0.5 51.0No5725Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51 35.0 33.0 -2.0 51.0No3825Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-30--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51 36.0 42.5 6.5 51.0Yes15075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students29228899Yes29128799Yes9696100Yes
High needs1019998Yes1009999Yes3535100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged706999Yes696899Yes2727100Yes
EL and Former EL3---3---2---
Students w/ disabilities474698Yes4646100Yes15---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian2---2-------
Afr. Amer./Black9---9---4---
Hispanic/Latino14---14---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---10---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White25525198Yes25525198Yes8585100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles