Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Paxton Center
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Paxton Center
Organization Information
District:Wachusett (07750000)School type:Elementary-Middle School
School:Paxton Center (07750040)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.8, Target = 96.1CPI = 90.8, Target = 96.1CPI = 90.8, Target = 96.1 93.3 91.0 90.8 -0.2 96.1 96.7 7836825No Change
High needsCPI = 77.7, Target = 89.6CPI = 77.7, Target = 89.6CPI = 77.7, Target = 89.6 82.2 79.2 77.7 -1.5 89.6 91.1 609325No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 86.6, Target = 89.6CPI = 86.6, Target = 89.6CPI = 86.6, Target = 89.6 88.7 88.7 86.6 -2.1 89.6 94.4 884325No Change
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 66, Target = 80.7CPI = 66, Target = 80.7CPI = 66, Target = 80.7 66.9 70.9 66.0 -4.9 80.7 83.5 61530Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/Latino -------21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91, Target = 96.4CPI = 91, Target = 96.4CPI = 91, Target = 96.4 93.9 91.4 91.0 -0.4 96.4 97.0 5932925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.9, Target = 93.1CPI = 84.9, Target = 93.1CPI = 84.9, Target = 93.1 88.2 83.3 84.9 1.6 93.1 94.1 7636850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 66.7, Target = 83.4CPI = 66.7, Target = 83.4CPI = 66.7, Target = 83.4 71.6 66.6 66.7 0.1 83.4 85.8 459350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 73.3, Target = 71.1CPI = 73.3, Target = 71.1CPI = 73.3, Target = 71.1 68.5 68.5 73.3 4.8 71.1 84.3 6443100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 54.7, Target = 74.8CPI = 54.7, Target = 74.8CPI = 54.7, Target = 74.8 56.8 58.6 54.7 -3.9 74.8 78.4 48530Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/Latino -------21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.5, Target = 93.6CPI = 85.5, Target = 93.6CPI = 85.5, Target = 93.6 89.0 84.2 85.5 1.3 93.6 94.5 6132950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.3, Target = 94.2CPI = 87.3, Target = 94.2CPI = 87.3, Target = 94.2 90.1 86.5 87.3 0.8 94.2 95.1 8812275On Target
High needsCPI = 69.8, Target = 84.8CPI = 69.8, Target = 84.8CPI = 69.8, Target = 84.8 73.9 72.6 69.8 -2.8 84.8 87.0 81240Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.3, Target = 94.6CPI = 88.3, Target = 94.6CPI = 88.3, Target = 94.6 90.7 87.7 88.3 0.6 94.6 95.4 7911175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.5 14.93680 3.9 3.036825
High needs 1.0 2.29325 12.9 10.89325
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0430 0.0 4.7430
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 1.6 3.85325 21.3 18.95325
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--7---7-
Hispanic/Latino--21---21-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.7 14.93290 4.3 3.332925
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 24.9 34.536825 9.3 9.53680
High needs 8.9 15.19325 23.8 24.7930
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.1 20.94325 28.6 16.34325
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 4.9 5.75325 27.9 35.8530
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--7---7-
Hispanic/Latino--21---21-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.1 35.032925 9.1 9.73290
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.6 19.712225 3.8 4.91220
High needs 6.5 12.52425 9.7 12.5240
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 16.1 18.011125 2.5 3.61110
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 48.0 56.0 8.0 51.0No30975On Target
High needsSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 51.5 57.0 5.5 51.0No8275On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 49.0 60.0 11.0 51.0No35100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 52.0 54.0 2.0 51.0No4975On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 48.0 54.0 6.0 51.0No27775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 43.0 51.0 8.0 51.0No30975On Target
High needsSGP = 39.5, Target = 51SGP = 39.5, Target = 51SGP = 39.5, Target = 51 38.0 39.5 1.5 51.0No8250Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 36.0 34.0 -2.0 51.0No3525Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 37.0 38.0 1.0 51.0No4950Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 42.0 50.0 8.0 51.0No27750Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.014-
High needs- 60.014-
EL and Former EL- 60.014-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students373373100Yes373373100Yes122122100Yes
High needs9595100Yes9595100Yes2424100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged4343100Yes4343100Yes12---
EL and Former EL11---11---2---
Students w/ disabilities5555100Yes5555100Yes12---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian7---7---2---
Afr. Amer./Black7---7---4---
Hispanic/Latino23---23---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White332332100Yes332332100Yes111111100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles