Massachusetts School and District Profiles

West Tisbury Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - West Tisbury Elementary

Organization Information
District:Up-Island Regional (07740000)School type:Elementary-Middle School
School:West Tisbury Elementary (07740020)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.6, Target = 98CPI = 90.6, Target = 98CPI = 90.6, Target = 98 96.5 90.7 90.6 -0.1 98.0 98.3 7620325No Change
High needsCPI = 83.2, Target = 96.7CPI = 83.2, Target = 96.7CPI = 83.2, Target = 96.7 94.3 83.8 83.2 -0.6 96.7 97.2 788525No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 86.1, Target = 90CPI = 86.1, Target = 90CPI = 86.1, Target = 90 89.1 89.1 86.1 -3.0 90.0 94.6 86360Declined
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 79.6, Target = 95.9CPI = 79.6, Target = 95.9CPI = 79.6, Target = 95.9 93.0 77.6 79.6 2.0 95.9 96.5 886050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------4--
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92, Target = 98CPI = 92, Target = 98CPI = 92, Target = 98 96.5 91.5 92.0 0.5 98.0 98.3 6717575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.3, Target = 94.9CPI = 91.3, Target = 94.9CPI = 91.3, Target = 94.9 91.3 87.0 91.3 4.3 94.9 95.7 91202100Above Target
High needsCPI = 84.4, Target = 90.7CPI = 84.4, Target = 90.7CPI = 84.4, Target = 90.7 84.1 79.8 84.4 4.6 90.7 92.1 938575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85.4, Target = 85.2CPI = 85.4, Target = 85.2 83.9 83.9 85.4 1.5 85.2 92.0 933675On Target
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 81.3, Target = 88CPI = 81.3, Target = 88CPI = 81.3, Target = 88 79.4 76.6 81.3 4.7 88.0 89.7 986075On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------4--
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.4, Target = 94.9CPI = 92.4, Target = 94.9CPI = 92.4, Target = 94.9 91.3 87.8 92.4 4.6 94.9 95.7 81174100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.3, Target = 96CPI = 91.3, Target = 96CPI = 91.3, Target = 96 93.2 86.0 91.3 5.3 96.0 96.6 9475100Above Target
High needsCPI = 85.2, Target = 93.4CPI = 85.2, Target = 93.4CPI = 85.2, Target = 93.4 88.7 76.0 85.2 9.2 93.4 94.4 953275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities  87.5---- 93.8-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.8, Target = 96CPI = 91.8, Target = 96CPI = 91.8, Target = 96 93.2 86.2 91.8 5.6 96.0 96.6 9067100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 8.5 15.820325 1.1 3.92030
High needs 5.4 8.28525 2.7 9.4850
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.4 11.13625 3.1 8.3360
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 4.1 5.06025 4.1 13.3600
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--4---4-
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 8.5 16.017525 0.7 2.31750
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 24.6 34.220225 5.1 2.520225
High needs 11.0 20.08525 11.0 4.78525
Econ. Disadvantaged 12.9 25.03625 0.0 5.6360
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 8.3 13.36025 16.7 6.76025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--4---4-
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.7 37.417425 5.3 1.117425
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 14.0 21.37525 3.5 4.0750
High needs 3.8 18.83225 7.7 9.4320
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--24---24-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.9 22.46725 4.3 3.06725
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 44.0 47.0 3.0 51.0No16650Below Target
High needsSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 37.0 37.0 0.0 51.0No6725Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51 29.0 33.5 4.5 51.0No2850Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 36.5, Target = 51SGP = 36.5, Target = 51SGP = 36.5, Target = 51 36.0 36.5 0.5 51.0Yes5075On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-4--
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 44.0 46.5 2.5 51.0No14250Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 48.5 60.0 11.5 51.0Yes161100Above Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 37.5 53.0 15.5 51.0Yes64100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51 50.0 57.5 7.5 51.0Yes2675On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51 36.0 41.5 5.5 51.0No4850Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-4--
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 52.0 59.0 7.0 51.0Yes13875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.05-
High needs- 60.05-
EL and Former EL- 60.05-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students208207100Yes209208100Yes7777100Yes
High needs888799Yes8989100Yes3333100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged383797Yes3939100Yes13---
EL and Former EL5---5---1---
Students w/ disabilities616098Yes6161100Yes2525100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.4---4---1---
Asian3---3---2---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---1---
Hispanic/Latino5---6-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.12---12---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White178178100Yes17817799Yes6969100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles