Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Tantasqua Regional Vocational

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Tantasqua Regional Vocational

Organization Information
District:Tantasqua (07700000)School type:High School
School:Tantasqua Regional Vocational (07700605)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.8, Target = 94.5 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 95.8, Target = 94.5CPI = 95.8, Target = 94.575 or Higher All Students 90.6 96.0 95.8 -0.2 94.5 95.3 24124100Above Target
High needsCPI = 90, Target = 87.8 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 90, Target = 87.8CPI = 90, Target = 87.875 or Higher High needs 79.0 90.3 90.0 -0.3 87.8 89.5 1745100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 96.2, Target = 93.8 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 96.2, Target = 93.8CPI = 96.2, Target = 93.875 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 93.2 93.2 96.2 3.0 93.8 96.6 5826100Above Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.8, Target = 94.9 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 95.8, Target = 94.975 or Higher White 91.2 95.7 95.8 0.1 94.9 95.6 1011375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.7, Target = 94.1 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 87.7, Target = 94.1 75 or Higher All Students 89.8 87.9 87.7 -0.2 94.1 94.9 2812425No Change
High needsCPI = 73.9, Target = 86.8 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 73.9, Target = 86.8 75 or Higher High needs 77.3 79.2 73.9 -5.3 86.8 88.7 17450Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.5, Target = 86.7 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 81.5, Target = 86.7 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 85.5 85.5 81.5 -4.0 86.7 92.8 33270Declined
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.6, Target = 93.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 87.6, Target = 93.8 75 or Higher White 89.4 87.3 87.6 0.3 93.8 94.7 1211350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.7, Target = 90.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 88.7, Target = 90.6 75 or Higher All Students 83.9 82.7 88.7 6.0 90.6 92.0 3211750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 79.1, Target = 82.9 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 79.1, Target = 82.9 75 or Higher High needs 70.7 75.0 79.1 4.1 82.9 85.4 304350Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------24--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.4, Target = 90.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 89.4, Target = 90.7 75 or Higher White 84.0 82.7 89.4 6.7 90.7 92.0 1710650Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 25.5 18.51240 1.4 0.812425
High needs 13.0 13.3450 3.7 2.24525
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.9 15.4260 2.3 0.02625
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 24.4 19.51130 1.5 0.911325
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 35.9 40.312425 8.5 8.11240
High needs 20.8 31.14525 15.1 20.0450
Econ. Disadvantaged 25.6 44.42725 9.3 11.1270
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 37.1 38.91130 9.1 8.81130
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 5.7 12.811725 0.7 3.41170
High needs 1.9 9.34325 1.9 7.0430
Econ. Disadvantaged--24---24-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 5.4 11.310625 0.8 2.81060
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 30, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 30, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 35.0 30.0 -5.0 51.0No1210Below Target
High needsSGP = 32, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 32, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 30.0 32.0 2.0 51.0No4450Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 33.5, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 33.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 30.0 33.5 3.5 51.0No2650Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 28.5, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 28.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 32.5 28.5 -4.0 51.0No1100Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 40, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 40, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 44.0 40.0 -4.0 51.0No12225Below Target
High needsSGP = 46, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 46, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 42.0 46.0 4.0 51.0No4450Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 47, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 47, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 44.0 47.0 3.0 51.0No2750Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 40, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 40, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 44.0 40.0 -4.0 51.0No11125Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 95.2, Target = 80 - All StudentsAll Students-Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.2, Target = 8075 or Higher All Students 90.4 95.2 4.8 80.0 90.084100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 92.9, Target = 80 - High needsHigh needs-Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.9, Target = 8075 or Higher High needs 89.8 92.9 3.1 80.0 90.04275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.015--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.02--
Asian --- 80.0 90.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.04--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.03--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 95.8, Target = 80 - WhiteWhite-Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.8, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.8, Target = 8075 or Higher White 89.7 95.8 6.1 80.0 90.072100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 95.2, Target = 85 - All StudentsAll Students-Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.2, Target = 8575 or Higher All Students 92.0 95.2 3.2 85.0 95.083100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 95.9, Target = 85 - High needsHigh needs-Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.9, Target = 8575 or Higher High needs 92.3 95.9 3.6 85.0 95.049100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.023--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.01--
Asian --- 85.0 95.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.03--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 94.9, Target = 85 - WhiteWhite-Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.9, Target = 8575 or Higher White 92.8 94.9 2.1 85.0 95.07875On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.4, Target = 0.2Dropout Rate 75 or Higher All Students 0.3 0.9 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.27647925No Change
High needsDropout Rate = 0, Target = 0Dropout Rate 75 or Higher High needs 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.091177100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  0.0---- 0.0-110--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------82--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------5--
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.5, Target = 0.2Dropout Rate 75 or Higher White 0.3 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.26143625No Change
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students13413399Yes13613499Yes136136100Yes
High needs515098Yes535196Yes5353100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3131100Yes3333100Yes33---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities23---24---24---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino9---9---9---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White12212199Yes12412298Yes124124100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles