Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Ruggles Lane

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Ruggles Lane

Organization Information
District:Quabbin (07530000)School type:Elementary School
School:Ruggles Lane (07530030)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.4, Target = 90.3CPI = 81.4, Target = 90.3CPI = 81.4, Target = 90.3 83.3 81.0 81.4 0.4 90.3 91.7 3121550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 74, Target = 84CPI = 74, Target = 84CPI = 74, Target = 84 72.6 72.1 74.0 1.9 84.0 86.3 4110250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.5, Target = 78.8CPI = 81.5, Target = 78.8CPI = 81.5, Target = 78.8 76.9 76.9 81.5 4.6 78.8 88.5 7369100Above Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 61.7, Target = 76CPI = 61.7, Target = 76CPI = 61.7, Target = 76 58.9 60.4 61.7 1.3 76.0 79.5 424950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.2, Target = 90.1CPI = 82.2, Target = 90.1CPI = 82.2, Target = 90.1 83.1 81.2 82.2 1.0 90.1 91.6 2019850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.8, Target = 88.7CPI = 83.8, Target = 88.7CPI = 83.8, Target = 88.7 80.7 81.6 83.8 2.2 88.7 90.4 4321350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 76.8, Target = 82.9CPI = 76.8, Target = 82.9CPI = 76.8, Target = 82.9 70.7 70.7 76.8 6.1 82.9 85.4 5410050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.5, Target = 76.8CPI = 81.5, Target = 76.8CPI = 81.5, Target = 76.8 74.7 74.7 81.5 6.8 76.8 87.4 7269100Above Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 64.9, Target = 73.8CPI = 64.9, Target = 73.8CPI = 64.9, Target = 73.8 55.0 58.3 64.9 6.6 73.8 77.5 514750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.4, Target = 89CPI = 84.4, Target = 89CPI = 84.4, Target = 89 81.1 81.9 84.4 2.5 89.0 90.6 3119650Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 74, Target = 91.3CPI = 74, Target = 91.3CPI = 74, Target = 91.3 85.1 84.1 74.0 -10.1 91.3 92.6 31520Declined
High needsCPI = 67.6, Target = 88.8CPI = 67.6, Target = 88.8CPI = 67.6, Target = 88.8 80.8 77.5 67.6 -9.9 88.8 90.4 48270Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 72.3, Target = 91CPI = 72.3, Target = 91CPI = 72.3, Target = 91 84.6 84.7 72.3 -12.4 91.0 92.3 12460Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 9.6 7.92150 9.6 7.021525
High needs 4.5 3.91020 16.2 12.710225
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.8 5.86925 7.7 8.7690
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 3.8 0.0490 28.3 20.44925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 9.8 8.11980 9.3 6.619825
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 30.4 29.12130 11.0 5.621325
High needs 16.2 10.01000 18.0 10.010025
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.2 11.6690 15.6 8.76925
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 9.3 6.4470 27.8 17.04725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.5 29.61960 10.8 5.119625
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 22.4 13.5520 5.2 7.7520
High needs 10.0 3.7270 10.0 14.8270
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 24.1 15.2460 5.6 8.7460
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 41.5 49.0 7.5 51.0No16750Below Target
High needsSGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51 49.0 48.5 -0.5 51.0No8250Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 44.0 44.0 0.0 51.0Yes5675On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 50.0 52.0 2.0 51.0No4175On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 41.5 49.0 7.5 51.0No15550Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 51 57.0 63.5 6.5 51.0No168100Above Target
High needsSGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51 52.0 65.5 13.5 51.0No82100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 48.0 66.0 18.0 51.0No57100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 70.5, Target = 51SGP = 70.5, Target = 51SGP = 70.5, Target = 51 52.0 70.5 18.5 51.0No40100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 57.0 63.0 6.0 51.0No155100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students225225100Yes22522399Yes575698Yes
High needs107107100Yes10710598Yes302997Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged7474100Yes7474100Yes19---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities5252100Yes525096Yes14---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black1---1-------
Hispanic/Latino10---10---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White206206100Yes20620499Yes515098Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles