Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Oakham Center
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Oakham Center
Organization Information
District:Quabbin (07530000)School type:Elementary School
School:Oakham Center (07530025)Grades served:02,03,04,05,06
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.5, Target = 90.1CPI = 86.5, Target = 90.1CPI = 86.5, Target = 90.1 83.0 88.0 86.5 -1.5 90.1 91.5 5413525No Change
High needsCPI = 75, Target = 85.2CPI = 75, Target = 85.2CPI = 75, Target = 85.2 74.7 78.1 75.0 -3.1 85.2 87.4 45440Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 72.4, Target = 77.1CPI = 72.4, Target = 77.1CPI = 72.4, Target = 77.1 75.0 75.0 72.4 -2.6 77.1 87.5 29290Declined
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75, Target = 81.5CPI = 75, Target = 81.5CPI = 75, Target = 81.5 68.2 76.8 75.0 -1.8 81.5 84.1 772725No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.4, Target = 90.1CPI = 86.4, Target = 90.1CPI = 86.4, Target = 90.1 83.1 88.5 86.4 -2.1 90.1 91.6 4012725No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.9, Target = 92.2CPI = 86.9, Target = 92.2CPI = 86.9, Target = 92.2 86.6 86.5 86.9 0.4 92.2 93.3 5513550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 80.7, Target = 87.2CPI = 80.7, Target = 87.2CPI = 80.7, Target = 87.2 78.1 77.0 80.7 3.7 87.2 89.1 714450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.4, Target = 75.8CPI = 78.4, Target = 75.8CPI = 78.4, Target = 75.8 73.6 73.6 78.4 4.8 75.8 86.8 5829100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 81.5, Target = 83CPI = 81.5, Target = 83CPI = 81.5, Target = 83 70.9 75.6 81.5 5.9 83.0 85.5 912775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.2, Target = 92.2CPI = 86.2, Target = 92.2CPI = 86.2, Target = 92.2 86.6 86.6 86.2 -0.4 92.2 93.3 4012725No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 75, Target = 97.1CPI = 75, Target = 97.1CPI = 75, Target = 97.1 95.0 80.8 75.0 -5.8 97.1 97.5 34370Declined
High needs -------14--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 76.5, Target = 97CPI = 76.5, Target = 97CPI = 76.5, Target = 97 94.8 81.6 76.5 -5.1 97.0 97.4 19340Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.2 18.51350 3.2 8.11350
High needs 6.3 4.5440 6.3 20.5440
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.4 3.4290 8.1 20.7290
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 7.1 3.7270 9.5 22.2270
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.2 18.91270 3.5 8.71270
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 27.6 26.71350 5.8 3.013525
High needs 4.7 15.94425 12.5 4.54425
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.4 17.22925 10.8 6.92925
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 4.8 7.42725 16.7 0.02725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 29.9 27.61270 6.3 3.112725
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.0 8.1370 7.0 10.8370
High needs--14---14-
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.8 8.8340 7.9 8.8340
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 50.0 50.0 0.0 51.0No9550Below Target
High needsSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 39.5 40.0 0.5 51.0Yes2575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 52.0 50.0 -2.0 51.0No8950Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 54.0 60.0 6.0 51.0No95100Above Target
High needsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 43.0 60.0 17.0 51.0No25100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 56.0 60.0 4.0 51.0No89100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students13713699Yes13713699Yes3737100Yes
High needs4545100Yes4545100Yes14---
Econ. Disadvantaged3030100Yes3030100Yes11---
EL and Former EL1---1---1---
Students w/ disabilities2828100Yes2828100Yes8---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2---1---
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino4---4---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White12912899Yes12912899Yes3434100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles