Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Center School

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Center School

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.3, Target = 95.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 93.3, Target = 95.8 75 or Higher All Students 92.8 93.6 93.3 -0.3 95.8 96.4 8728575On Target
High needsCPI = 76.3, Target = 81.8 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 76.3, Target = 81.8 75 or Higher High needs 68.8 77.0 76.3 -0.7 81.8 84.4 535625No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 70.4, Target = 66.8 - Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities-CPI = 70.4, Target = 66.8CPI = 70.4, Target = 66.875 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 55.7 69.2 70.4 1.2 66.8 77.9 6638100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------17--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.4, Target = 96.2 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 94.4, Target = 96.2 75 or Higher White 93.5 93.8 94.4 0.6 96.2 96.8 87254100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94, Target = 93.8 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 94, Target = 93.875 or Higher All Students 89.3 91.3 94.0 2.7 93.8 94.7 8928475On Target
High needsCPI = 77.7, Target = 79.6 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 77.7, Target = 79.6 75 or Higher High needs 65.0 71.0 77.7 6.7 79.6 82.5 585650Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 73.6, Target = 64.2 - Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities-CPI = 73.6, Target = 64.2CPI = 73.6, Target = 64.275 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 52.3 63.7 73.6 9.9 64.2 76.2 7437100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------17--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.5, Target = 94 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 95.5, Target = 94CPI = 95.5, Target = 9475 or Higher White 89.7 91.8 95.5 3.7 94.0 94.9 93253100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.1, Target = 96.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 88.1, Target = 96.5 75 or Higher All Students 94.0 92.6 88.1 -4.5 96.5 97.0 75820Declined
High needs -------16--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------5--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.4, Target = 96.4 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 91.4, Target = 96.4 75 or Higher White 93.9 92.9 91.4 -1.5 96.4 97.0 827075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 21.2 20.72850 2.0 2.82850
High needs 6.0 7.15625 12.0 14.3560
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities 3.3 5.33825 20.0 18.4380
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--17---17-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.6 20.92540 1.7 2.82540
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 46.9 56.028425 2.3 3.52840
High needs 18.0 21.45625 14.0 16.1560
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities 6.5 16.23725 19.4 21.6370
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--17---17-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 47.9 56.525325 2.4 2.82530
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 33.9 28.0820 0.0 6.1820
High needs--16---16-
Econ. Disadvantaged--5---5-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 34.9 31.4700 0.0 4.3700
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 63, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 59.5 63.0 3.5 51.0No187100Above Target
High needsSGP = 42, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 42, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 53.0 42.0 -11.0 51.0No3350Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 63, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 5175 or Higher White 59.0 63.0 4.0 51.0Yes175100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 69, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 55.0 69.0 14.0 51.0Yes188100Above Target
High needsSGP = 61.5, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 35.0 61.5 26.5 51.0Yes34100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 69, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 5175 or Higher White 55.0 69.0 14.0 51.0Yes175100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.012.00-
High needs- 60.012.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.012.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students290289100Yes290290100Yes8282100Yes
High needs605998Yes5959100Yes16---
Econ. Disadvantaged16---16---5---
EL and Former EL16---16---4---
Students w/ disabilities3939100Yes3838100Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian17---17---5---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---3---
Hispanic/Latino8---8---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White258257100Yes257257100Yes7070100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles