Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mary Rowlandson Elementary

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Mary Rowlandson Elementary

Organization Information

District:

Nashoba (07250000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Mary Rowlandson Elementary (07250010)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.4	89.0	89.7	0.7	92.7	93.7	68	232	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		76.0	75.7	80.7	5.0	86.0	88.0	73	83	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		81.3	81.3	85.2	3.9	82.9	90.7	87	32	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		73.0	67.1	75.8	8.7	84.3	86.5	80	59	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		87.9	89.3	90.0	0.7	92.9	94.0	62	208	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.6	88.6	90.0	1.4	92.8	93.8	70	230	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		77.1	75.3	82.4	7.1	86.6	88.6	77	81	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		79.7	79.7	90.0	10.3	81.4	89.9	95	30	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		76.0	68.5	78.9	10.4	86.0	88.0	86	58	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		88.2	89.1	90.3	1.2	93.1	94.1	64	206	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.1	91.3	87.3	-4.0	90.7	92.1	72	75	0	Declined
High needs		68.8	-	-	-	-	84.4	-	29	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		84.3	92.3	87.9	-4.4	90.8	92.2	64	66	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	18.8	17.2	232	0	6.3	1.3	232	25
High needs	3.9	6.0	83	25	17.1	3.6	83	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	9.4	9.4	32	0	18.8	0.0	32	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	1.7	59	25	24.1	5.1	59	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	18.9	16.8	208	0	5.5	1.0	208	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	30.4	33.5	230	25	4.0	1.7	230	25
High needs	9.2	22.2	81	25	10.5	4.9	81	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	18.8	36.7	30	25	12.5	3.3	30	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.9	10.3	58	25	14.8	5.2	58	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	30.3	33.5	206	25	4.0	1.5	206	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	17.4	18.7	75	0	0.0	4.0	75	0
High needs	-	-	29	-	-	-	29	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	17.7	16.7	66	0	0.0	4.5	66	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		47.0	58.0	11.0	51.0	No	156	75	On Target
High needs		25.0	50.0	25.0	51.0	No	53	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		26.0	50.0	24.0	51.0	No	37	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		48.0	57.0	9.0	51.0	No	141	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		32.0	50.0	18.0	51.0	No	154	100	Above Target
High needs		28.0	46.0	18.0	51.0	No	52	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		27.0	44.5	17.5	51.0	Yes	36	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		32.5	51.0	18.5	51.0	No	139	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	3.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	3.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	3.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	236	236	100	Yes	235	234	100	Yes	77	77	100	Yes
High needs	84	84	100	Yes	83	82	99	Yes	29	29	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	33	33	100	Yes	32	31	97	Yes	11	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	6	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	60	60	100	Yes	59	59	100	Yes	22	22	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	209	209	100	Yes	208	207	100	Yes	66	66	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.