Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mary Rowlandson Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Mary Rowlandson Elementary
Organization Information
District:Nashoba (07250000)School type:Elementary School
School:Mary Rowlandson Elementary (07250010)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.7, Target = 92.7CPI = 89.7, Target = 92.7CPI = 89.7, Target = 92.7 87.4 89.0 89.7 0.7 92.7 93.7 6823250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 80.7, Target = 86CPI = 80.7, Target = 86CPI = 80.7, Target = 86 76.0 75.7 80.7 5.0 86.0 88.0 738350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85.2, Target = 82.9CPI = 85.2, Target = 82.9CPI = 85.2, Target = 82.9 81.3 81.3 85.2 3.9 82.9 90.7 8732100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75.8, Target = 84.3CPI = 75.8, Target = 84.3CPI = 75.8, Target = 84.3 73.0 67.1 75.8 8.7 84.3 86.5 805950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90, Target = 92.9CPI = 90, Target = 92.9CPI = 90, Target = 92.9 87.9 89.3 90.0 0.7 92.9 94.0 6220850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90, Target = 92.8CPI = 90, Target = 92.8CPI = 90, Target = 92.8 87.6 88.6 90.0 1.4 92.8 93.8 7023050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 82.4, Target = 86.6CPI = 82.4, Target = 86.6CPI = 82.4, Target = 86.6 77.1 75.3 82.4 7.1 86.6 88.6 778150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 90, Target = 81.4CPI = 90, Target = 81.4CPI = 90, Target = 81.4 79.7 79.7 90.0 10.3 81.4 89.9 9530100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 78.9, Target = 86CPI = 78.9, Target = 86CPI = 78.9, Target = 86 76.0 68.5 78.9 10.4 86.0 88.0 865850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.3, Target = 93.1CPI = 90.3, Target = 93.1CPI = 90.3, Target = 93.1 88.2 89.1 90.3 1.2 93.1 94.1 6420650Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.3, Target = 90.7CPI = 87.3, Target = 90.7CPI = 87.3, Target = 90.7 84.1 91.3 87.3 -4.0 90.7 92.1 72750Declined
High needs  68.8---- 84.4-29--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.9, Target = 90.8CPI = 87.9, Target = 90.8CPI = 87.9, Target = 90.8 84.3 92.3 87.9 -4.4 90.8 92.2 64660Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.8 17.22320 6.3 1.323225
High needs 3.9 6.08325 17.1 3.68325
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.4 9.4320 18.8 0.03225
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 1.75925 24.1 5.15925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.9 16.82080 5.5 1.020825
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 30.4 33.523025 4.0 1.723025
High needs 9.2 22.28125 10.5 4.98125
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.8 36.73025 12.5 3.33025
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities 1.9 10.35825 14.8 5.25825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 30.3 33.520625 4.0 1.520625
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 17.4 18.7750 0.0 4.0750
High needs--29---29-
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 17.7 16.7660 0.0 4.5660
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 47.0 58.0 11.0 51.0No15675On Target
High needsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 25.0 50.0 25.0 51.0No53100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 26.0 50.0 24.0 51.0No37100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 48.0 57.0 9.0 51.0No14175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 32.0 50.0 18.0 51.0No154100Above Target
High needsSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 28.0 46.0 18.0 51.0No52100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-18--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51 27.0 44.5 17.5 51.0Yes36100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 32.5 51.0 18.5 51.0No139100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03-
High needs- 60.03-
EL and Former EL- 60.03-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students236236100Yes235234100Yes7777100Yes
High needs8484100Yes838299Yes2929100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3333100Yes323197Yes11---
EL and Former EL6---5---1---
Students w/ disabilities6060100Yes5959100Yes2222100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian6---6---4---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---2---
Hispanic/Latino13---13---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White209209100Yes208207100Yes6666100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles