Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mohawk Trail Regional School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Mohawk Trail Regional High

Organization Information

District:

Mohawk Trail (07170000)

School type:

Middle-High School or K-12

School:

Mohawk Trail Regional High (07170505)

Grades served:

07,08,09,10,11,12

Region:

Pioneer Valley

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		90.9	93.4	92.5	-0.9	94.7	95.5	59	221	25	No Change
High needs		83.8	89.2	85.7	-3.5	90.6	91.9	62	110	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		89.6	89.6	88.4	-1.2	90.5	94.8	56	84	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		72.8	82.8	72.5	-10.3	84.1	86.4	43	50	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		91.0	93.2	93.4	0.2	94.8	95.5	44	200	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		80.7	82.0	78.3	-3.7	88.7	90.4	37	220	0	Declined
High needs		69.1	71.0	66.8	-4.2	82.0	84.6	43	110	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		70.7	70.7	69.9	-0.8	73.1	85.4	40	84	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		51.1	60.4	49.0	-11.4	71.5	75.6	33	49	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		80.8	82.6	78.9	-3.7	88.8	90.4	22	199	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		80.2	81.3	81.1	-0.2	88.5	90.1	59	128	25	No Change
High needs		71.2	68.4	73.0	4.6	83.2	85.6	71	62	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		67.9	67.9	72.4	4.5	70.6	84.0	62	48	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		57.2	59.7	60.4	0.7	75.0	78.6	62	24	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		80.4	81.0	80.6	-0.4	88.6	90.2	38	111	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	21.6	19.9	221	0	1.4	2.7	221	0
High needs	9.8	8.2	110	0	2.9	5.5	110	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	9.1	10.7	84	25	2.6	4.8	84	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	5.9	0.0	50	0	3.9	12.0	50	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	22.5	20.5	200	0	1.6	1.5	200	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	29.1	24.1	220	0	11.2	12.7	220	0
High needs	16.8	10.0	110	0	20.8	22.7	110	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	15.8	11.9	84	0	18.4	20.2	84	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	11.3	2.0	49	0	37.7	42.9	49	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	29.4	24.6	199	0	10.7	12.6	199	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	13.2	6.3	128	0	7.4	7.0	128	0
High needs	6.6	1.6	62	0	16.4	11.3	62	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.5	2.1	48	0	17.4	14.6	48	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	3.2	0.0	24	0	25.8	25.0	24	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	14.5	7.2	111	0	7.3	7.2	111	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		50.0	52.0	2.0	51.0	No	208	75	On Target
High needs		47.0	47.5	0.5	51.0	No	100	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		47.0	49.0	2.0	51.0	No	78	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		45.0	41.0	-4.0	51.0	No	41	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		48.0	54.0	6.0	51.0	No	190	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		58.0	41.5	-16.5	51.0	No	210	50	Below Target
High needs		59.0	45.0	-14.0	51.0	No	101	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		60.0	40.5	-19.5	51.0	No	80	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		49.0	43.0	-6.0	51.0	No	41	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		58.0	40.5	-17.5	51.0	No	192	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	1.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	1.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	1.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		86.5	87.6	1.1	80.0	90.0	89	75	On Target
High needs		74.4	79.2	4.8	80.0	90.0	53	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	20	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		88.9	90.1	1.2	80.0	90.0	81	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		85.2	90.5	5.3	85.0	95.0	74	75	On Target
High needs		72.5	82.1	9.6	85.0	95.0	39	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	16	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	7	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		86.1	92.1	6.0	85.0	95.0	63	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		3.6	2.3	2.7	-0.4	2.1	1.8	24	293	25	No Change
High needs		7.0	4.1	7.1	-3.0	4.1	3.5	13	99	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		6.3	-	-	-	-	3.2	-	64	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		9.3	4.8	11.3	-6.5	5.4	4.7	7	53	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		2.8	2.2	1.9	0.3	1.6	1.4	23	265	25	No Change

Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more) About the Data
	2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged	PPI Points
All students	1	0
High needs	1	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	229	228	100	Yes	228	227	100	Yes	134	134	100	Yes
High needs	116	115	99	Yes	115	115	100	Yes	68	68	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	90	89	99	Yes	89	89	100	Yes	54	54	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	53	53	100	Yes	52	52	100	Yes	27	27	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	7	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	207	206	100	Yes	206	205	100	Yes	117	117	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.