Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Buckland-Shelburne Regional

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Buckland-Shelburne Regional

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.5, Target = 89.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 82.5, Target = 89.6 75 or Higher All Students 82.1 91.6 82.5 -9.1 89.6 91.1 351000Declined
High needsCPI = 75, Target = 83.9 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 75, Target = 83.9 75 or Higher High needs 72.4 88.4 75.0 -13.4 83.9 86.2 45590Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.6, Target = 91.7 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 80.6, Target = 91.7 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 90.9 90.9 80.6 -10.3 91.7 95.5 70450Declined
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities  62.9---- 81.5-30--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.1, Target = 89.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 82.1, Target = 89.8 75 or Higher White 82.5 91.3 82.1 -9.2 89.8 91.3 19980Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78, Target = 87.4 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 78, Target = 87.4 75 or Higher All Students 78.4 77.7 78.0 0.3 87.4 89.2 219950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 72, Target = 82.2 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 72, Target = 82.2 75 or Higher High needs 69.5 74.4 72.0 -2.4 82.2 84.8 325925No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75.6, Target = 77.1 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 75.6, Target = 77.1 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 75.0 75.0 75.6 0.6 77.1 87.5 454450Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities  63.7---- 81.9-31--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 77.9, Target = 87 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 77.9, Target = 87 75 or Higher White 77.7 76.6 77.9 1.3 87.0 88.9 119650Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 76.3, Target = 84.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 76.3, Target = 84.8 75 or Higher All Students 74.0 85.7 76.3 -9.4 84.8 87.0 37200Declined
High needs -------12--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 76.3, Target = 84.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 76.3, Target = 84.8 75 or Higher White 73.9 87.0 76.3 -10.7 84.8 87.0 18200Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 19.3 11.01000 0.0 9.01000
High needs 16.3 6.8590 0.0 13.6590
Econ. Disadvantaged 21.2 8.9450 0.0 8.9450
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--30---30-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 20.5 11.2980 0.0 9.2980
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 19.3 14.1990 12.0 11.1990
High needs 11.6 1.7590 11.6 11.9590
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.2 2.3440 15.2 9.14425
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--31---31-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 20.5 14.6960 12.8 11.59625
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 14.3 5.0200 0.0 10.0200
High needs--12---12-
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.8 5.0200 0.0 10.0200
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 28.5, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 28.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 64.0 28.5 -35.5 51.0No640Below Target
High needsSGP = 29, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 29, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 66.0 29.0 -37.0 51.0No390Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-30--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 28, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 28, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 64.0 28.0 -36.0 51.0No630Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 55.0 48.0 -7.0 51.0Yes6375On Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 49, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 48.0 49.0 1.0 51.0No3950Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-29--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 55.0 48.0 -7.0 51.0Yes6175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students10610296Yes10610195Yes232094No
High needs625995Yes625995Yes13---
Econ. Disadvantaged464598Yes464496Yes8---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities323094No323197Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black1---1-------
Hispanic/Latino2---2-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.------------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White1029997Yes1029795Yes232094No

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles