Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Nipmuc Regional High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Nipmuc Regional High
Organization Information
District:Mendon-Upton (07100000)School type:High School
School:Nipmuc Regional High (07100510)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 99.5, Target = 99.3CPI = 99.5, Target = 99.3 98.8 99.8 99.5 -0.3 99.3 99.4 84143100Above Target
High needsCPI = 97.8, Target = 95.9CPI = 97.8, Target = 95.9CPI = 97.8, Target = 95.9 93.0- 97.8 3.5 95.9 96.5 8034100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 99.4, Target = 99.3CPI = 99.4, Target = 99.3 98.8 99.8 99.4 -0.4 99.3 99.4 69129100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.8, Target = 98CPI = 95.8, Target = 98CPI = 95.8, Target = 98 96.5 96.0 95.8 -0.2 98.0 98.3 7414425No Change
High needsCPI = 85.7, Target = 90.3CPI = 85.7, Target = 90.3CPI = 85.7, Target = 90.3 83.3- 85.7 3.1 90.3 91.7 653550Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.3, Target = 97.9CPI = 96.3, Target = 97.9CPI = 96.3, Target = 97.9 96.4 95.9 96.3 0.4 97.9 98.2 6913050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 98.1, Target = 98.4CPI = 98.1, Target = 98.4 97.2 97.5 98.1 0.6 98.4 98.6 92135100Above Target
High needsCPI = 93.4, Target = 98.2CPI = 93.4, Target = 98.2CPI = 93.4, Target = 98.2 96.9- 93.4 7.7 98.2 98.5 933475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 98.4, Target = 98.3CPI = 98.4, Target = 98.3 97.1 97.4 98.4 1.0 98.3 98.6 90124100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 72.1 73.41430 0.0 0.014325
High needs 27.3 35.33425 4.5 0.03425
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 71.2 72.91290 0.0 0.012925
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 73.6 71.51440 3.2 2.814425
High needs 32.6 37.13525 11.6 11.4350
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 73.6 70.81300 3.3 2.313025
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 47.5 55.613525 0.0 0.71350
High needs 16.7 29.43425 9.5 2.93425
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 48.7 55.612425 0.0 0.81240
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 61.0 67.0 6.0 51.0No131100Above Target
High needsSGP = 74, Target = 51SGP = 74, Target = 51SGP = 74, Target = 51 64.0 74.0 10.0 51.0Yes29100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51 61.0 65.5 4.5 51.0No122100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 60.0 61.0 1.0 51.0No132100Above Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 68.0 49.0 -19.0 51.0Yes3075On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 60.0 61.0 1.0 51.0Yes123100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 92, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 92, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 92, Target = 80 96.2 92.0 -4.2 80.0 90.017675On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 73.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 73.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 73.1, Target = 80 91.8 73.1 -18.7 80.0 90.0520Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.02--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.033--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.04--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.03--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.05--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.03--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 91.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.3, Target = 80 96.4 91.3 -5.1 80.0 90.016175On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 96.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.2, Target = 85 97.3 96.2 -1.1 85.0 95.0182100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 91.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.8, Target = 85 94.6 91.8 -2.8 85.0 95.04975On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.03--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.025--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.04--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.03--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.05--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.01--
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 96.4, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.4, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.4, Target = 85 97.2 96.4 -0.8 85.0 95.0168100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.6, Target = 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.36662325No Change
High needsDropout Rate = 1.5, Target = 0.6 1.0 1.4 1.5 -0.1 0.6 0.55713025No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------60--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------86--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.7, Target = 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 -0.1 0.3 0.35358425No Change
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students10
High needs10
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students14614499Yes14614599Yes14614599Yes
High needs353497Yes3535100Yes3535100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged21---21---21---
EL and Former EL3---3---3---
Students w/ disabilities17---17---17---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian6---6---6---
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino3---3---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---5---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White13213098Yes13213199Yes13213199Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles