Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Essex Elementary
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Essex Elementary
Organization Information
District:Manchester Essex Regional (06980000)School type:Elementary School
School:Essex Elementary (06980020)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.8, Target = 95.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 88.8, Target = 95.2 75 or Higher All Students 91.7 91.5 88.8 -2.7 95.2 95.9 651360Declined
High needsCPI = 77.2, Target = 88.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 77.2, Target = 88.5 75 or Higher High needs 80.2 80.8 77.2 -3.6 88.5 90.1 57340Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89, Target = 95.5 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 89, Target = 95.5 75 or Higher White 92.2 91.9 89.0 -2.9 95.5 96.1 551340Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.7, Target = 94.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 89.7, Target = 94.8 75 or Higher All Students 91.0 88.2 89.7 1.5 94.8 95.5 6913650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 75.7, Target = 86.9 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 75.7, Target = 86.9 75 or Higher High needs 77.6 71.7 75.7 4.0 86.9 88.8 493450Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.6, Target = 94.9 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 89.6, Target = 94.9 75 or Higher White 91.3 88.4 89.6 1.2 94.9 95.7 6013450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.7, Target = 91.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 89.7, Target = 91.5 75 or Higher All Students 85.5 92.0 89.7 -2.3 91.5 92.8 824675On Target
High needs -------9--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------5--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.7, Target = 91.5 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 89.7, Target = 91.5 75 or Higher White 85.5 92.3 89.7 -2.6 91.5 92.8 744675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.4 9.61360 3.7 4.41360
High needs 6.7 0.0340 13.3 11.83425
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.2 9.01340 3.0 4.51340
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 33.1 36.813625 3.7 4.41360
High needs 13.3 17.63425 16.7 14.73425
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 33.3 36.61340 3.8 4.51340
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.9 26.14625 0.0 2.2460
High needs--9---9-
Econ. Disadvantaged--5---5-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--5---5-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 16.7 26.14625 0.0 2.2460
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 37.5, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 37.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 52.0 37.5 -14.5 51.0No8825Below Target
High needs --- 51.0-22--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 36, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 36, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 52.0 36.0 -16.0 51.0No8625Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 59, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 58.0 59.0 1.0 51.0Yes8875On Target
High needs --- 51.0-22--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 5175 or Higher White 58.0 57.0 -1.0 51.0Yes8675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.06.00-
High needs- 60.06.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.06.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students138138100Yes138138100Yes4747100Yes
High needs3535100Yes3535100Yes9---
Econ. Disadvantaged21---21---5---
EL and Former EL4---4---1---
Students w/ disabilities16---16---5---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino------------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White135135100Yes135135100Yes4747100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles