Massachusetts School and District Profiles

King Philip Middle School
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - King Philip Middle School
Organization Information
District:King Philip (06900000)School type:Middle School
School:King Philip Middle School (06900510)Grades served:07,08
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.1, Target = 97.7 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 95.1, Target = 97.7 75 or Higher All Students 96.1 94.9 95.1 0.2 97.7 98.1 8175975On Target
High needsCPI = 82.9, Target = 89 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 82.9, Target = 89 75 or Higher High needs 81.1 83.6 82.9 -0.7 89.0 90.6 6616525No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 87.8, Target = 87.7 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 87.8, Target = 87.775 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 86.6 86.6 87.8 1.2 87.7 93.3 747675On Target
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 76.7, Target = 85.7 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 76.7, Target = 85.7 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 75.5 78.6 76.7 -1.9 85.7 87.8 7310525No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------14--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 95, Target = 97.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 95, Target = 97.7 75 or Higher White 96.1 95.2 95.0 -0.2 97.7 98.1 7370075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.8, Target = 89.4 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 85.8, Target = 89.4 75 or Higher All Students 81.8 84.3 85.8 1.5 89.4 90.9 7375550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 61, Target = 73.3 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 61, Target = 73.3 75 or Higher High needs 54.2 61.6 61.0 -0.6 73.3 77.1 3916325No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 73.3, Target = 72.6 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 73.3, Target = 72.675 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 70.1 70.1 73.3 3.2 72.6 85.1 727475On Target
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 47.6, Target = 70.5 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 47.6, Target = 70.5 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 49.5 51.2 47.6 -3.6 70.5 74.8 441040Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------14--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 85.8, Target = 89.4 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 85.8, Target = 89.4 75 or Higher White 81.8 84.7 85.8 1.1 89.4 90.9 6669750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.5, Target = 87.9 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 80.5, Target = 87.9 75 or Higher All Students 79.3 85.8 80.5 -5.3 87.9 89.7 734160Declined
High needsCPI = 64.2, Target = 77.3 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 64.2, Target = 77.3 75 or Higher High needs 61.0 70.1 64.2 -5.9 77.3 80.5 67970Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 66.8, Target = 79.7 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 66.8, Target = 79.7 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 77.8 77.8 66.8 -11.0 79.7 88.9 66490Declined
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 58.2, Target = 76.8 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 58.2, Target = 76.8 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 60.2 62.7 58.2 -4.5 76.8 80.1 72580Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 80.2, Target = 88.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 80.2, Target = 88.3 75 or Higher White 79.9 86.2 80.2 -6.0 88.3 90.0 633820Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 17.9 18.77590 0.7 1.87590
High needs 4.5 6.116525 2.5 6.71650
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.2 9.27625 2.7 6.6760
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 1.0 2.910525 3.8 9.51050
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--14---14-
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--15---15-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 18.5 18.47000 0.6 1.97000
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 29.0 33.075525 9.5 9.77550
High needs 7.6 10.416325 31.2 33.71630
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.1 17.67425 22.2 23.0740
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 3.8 3.81040 43.8 48.11040
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--14---14-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--15---15-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 29.0 32.669725 9.4 9.96970
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 4.1 3.84160 3.6 6.34160
High needs 0.0 2.19725 15.6 18.6970
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 2.04925 8.3 18.4490
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 1.75825 23.5 24.1580
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--15---15-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 4.3 3.93820 3.2 6.83820
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 34, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 34, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 41.0 34.0 -7.0 51.0Yes72475On Target
High needsSGP = 32, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 32, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 42.0 32.0 -10.0 51.0No14825Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 29, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 29, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 42.0 29.0 -13.0 51.0Yes6675On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 33.5, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 33.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 42.0 33.5 -8.5 51.0No9625Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-14--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-9--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 33.5, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 33.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 42.0 33.5 -8.5 51.0No66825Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 39, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 39, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 37.5 39.0 1.5 51.0No72250Below Target
High needsSGP = 33, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 33, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 37.0 33.0 -4.0 51.0No14825Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 28.5, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 28.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 35.0 28.5 -6.5 51.0Yes6475On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 34, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities SGP = 34, Target = 51 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 37.0 34.0 -3.0 51.0No9725Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-14--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 38, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 38, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 38.0 38.0 0.0 51.0No66725Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students80176996Yes80176495Yes42942499Yes
High needs18517394No18517092No10710497Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged858195Yes857993No565496Yes
EL and Former EL6---6---4---
Students w/ disabilities11710892No11710791No636197Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian14---14---7---
Afr. Amer./Black10---10---1---
Hispanic/Latino23---23---16---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.15---15---10---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White73870996Yes73870596Yes39438999Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles