Massachusetts School and District Profiles

King Philip Regional High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - King Philip Regional High
Organization Information
District:King Philip (06900000)School type:High School
School:King Philip Regional High (06900505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 99.8, Target = 98.8CPI = 99.8, Target = 98.8 98.0 99.1 99.8 0.7 98.8 99.0 94322100Above Target
High needsCPI = 98.6, Target = 94.6CPI = 98.6, Target = 94.6CPI = 98.6, Target = 94.6 90.8 96.1 98.6 2.5 94.6 95.4 8937100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 99.8, Target = 98.8CPI = 99.8, Target = 98.8 97.9 99.2 99.8 0.6 98.8 99.0 87303100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.4, Target = 96.6CPI = 97.4, Target = 96.6 94.1 95.6 97.4 1.8 96.6 97.1 8332075On Target
High needsCPI = 90.8, Target = 84.8CPI = 90.8, Target = 84.8CPI = 90.8, Target = 84.8 74.0 85.1 90.8 5.7 84.8 87.0 8538100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 97.3, Target = 96.5CPI = 97.3, Target = 96.5 94.0 95.8 97.3 1.5 96.5 97.0 7730175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 98.8, Target = 96.1CPI = 98.8, Target = 96.1CPI = 98.8, Target = 96.1 93.3 96.4 98.8 2.4 96.1 96.7 97308100Above Target
High needsCPI = 96.2, Target = 85.1CPI = 96.2, Target = 85.1CPI = 96.2, Target = 85.1 74.5 86.2 96.2 10.0 85.1 87.3 9833100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 98.7, Target = 96.2CPI = 98.7, Target = 96.2CPI = 98.7, Target = 96.2 93.5 96.6 98.7 2.1 96.2 96.8 93289100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 63.3 65.83220 0.0 0.032225
High needs 25.0 24.3370 0.0 0.03725
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 63.9 66.03030 0.0 0.030325
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 67.0 75.032025 1.6 1.332025
High needs 32.3 42.13825 4.8 7.9380
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 67.8 76.730125 1.7 1.330125
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 47.4 61.430825 1.3 0.030825
High needs 19.0 39.43325 6.9 0.03325
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 47.7 62.328925 1.4 0.028925
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 42.0 46.0 4.0 51.0Yes31475On Target
High needsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 42.5 47.0 4.5 51.0Yes3475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 42.0 45.0 3.0 51.0Yes29675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51.5, Target = 51SGP = 51.5, Target = 51 54.0 51.5 -2.5 51.0Yes31275On Target
High needsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 54.0 51.0 -3.0 51.0Yes3575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 54.0 51.0 -3.0 51.0Yes29375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 97.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.1, Target = 80 94.2 97.1 2.9 80.0 90.0274100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 90, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 90, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 90, Target = 80 75.4 90.0 14.6 80.0 90.06075On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.033--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.02--
Asian --- 80.0 90.03--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.02--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.05--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 97.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.3, Target = 80 94.1 97.3 3.2 80.0 90.0260100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 95.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.1, Target = 85 94.7 95.1 0.4 85.0 95.0325100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 78.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 78.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 78.9, Target = 85 86.9 78.9 -8.0 85.0 95.0570Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.038--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 95, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 95, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 95, Target = 85 94.5 95.0 0.5 85.0 95.0323100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.6, Target = 1.3 2.3 0.8 0.6 0.2 1.3 1.266129475On Target
High needsDropout Rate = 4.1, Target = 1.5 2.5 3.0 4.1 -1.1 1.5 1.3261690Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------69--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------115--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------4--
Asian -------19--
Afr. Amer./Black -------13--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------21--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.7, Target = 1.3 2.2 0.7 0.7 0.0 1.3 1.153122575On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students32432299Yes32432199Yes32432099Yes
High needs393795Yes3939100Yes393897Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged22---22---22---
EL and Former EL2---2---2---
Students w/ disabilities19---19---19---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian5---5---5---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---5---
Hispanic/Latino3---3---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---5---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White30530399Yes30530299Yes30530199Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles