Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Gateway Regional Middle School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

This organization is currently closed.


2016 Accountability Data - Gateway Regional Junior High School
Organization Information
District:Gateway (06720000)School type:Middle School
School:Gateway Regional Junior High School (06720405)Grades served:07,08
Region:Berkshires +Title I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.2, Target = 91.5CPI = 89.2, Target = 91.5CPI = 89.2, Target = 91.5 85.5 86.9 89.2 2.3 91.5 92.8 4415050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 80.6, Target = 84.4CPI = 80.6, Target = 84.4CPI = 80.6, Target = 84.4 73.3 76.8 80.6 3.8 84.4 86.7 505850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 88.7, Target = 82.7CPI = 88.7, Target = 82.7CPI = 88.7, Target = 82.7 81.1 81.1 88.7 7.6 82.7 90.6 7942100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.3, Target = 91.4CPI = 90.3, Target = 91.4CPI = 90.3, Target = 91.4 85.2 87.1 90.3 3.2 91.4 92.6 3713975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 72.2, Target = 77.3CPI = 72.2, Target = 77.3CPI = 72.2, Target = 77.3 61.1 69.5 72.2 2.7 77.3 80.6 2715050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 62.1, Target = 67.6CPI = 62.1, Target = 67.6CPI = 62.1, Target = 67.6 44.4 58.0 62.1 4.1 67.6 72.2 455850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 71.4, Target = 64.3CPI = 71.4, Target = 64.3CPI = 71.4, Target = 64.3 61.1 61.1 71.4 10.3 64.3 80.6 6442100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 72.8, Target = 77.1CPI = 72.8, Target = 77.1CPI = 72.8, Target = 77.1 60.8 70.3 72.8 2.5 77.1 80.4 1513950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 63.4, Target = 81.8CPI = 63.4, Target = 81.8CPI = 63.4, Target = 81.8 68.8 72.7 63.4 -9.3 81.8 84.4 21710Declined
High needsCPI = 57.3, Target = 71.9CPI = 57.3, Target = 71.9CPI = 57.3, Target = 71.9 51.9 61.3 57.3 -4.0 71.9 76.0 32240Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 64.4, Target = 82CPI = 64.4, Target = 82CPI = 64.4, Target = 82 69.1 72.9 64.4 -8.5 82.0 84.6 8660Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 12.1 5.31500 5.1 7.31500
High needs 5.7 0.0580 10.0 15.5580
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.5 0.0420 7.5 7.1420
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 10.9 5.81390 5.4 6.51390
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.5 11.31500 20.6 22.01500
High needs 10.1 8.6580 34.8 36.2580
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.5 11.9420 26.9 23.84225
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 13.1 12.21390 18.6 20.91390
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 0.0 0.0710 11.7 16.9710
High needs 0.0 0.0240 22.5 37.5240
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 0.0 0.0660 11.0 13.6660
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 54.0 44.0 -10.0 51.0Yes14675On Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 50.0 44.0 -6.0 51.0Yes5575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 54.0 40.0 -14.0 51.0Yes4175On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 54.0 46.5 -7.5 51.0Yes13675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 48.0 34.0 -14.0 51.0No14725Below Target
High needsSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 45.0 36.0 -9.0 51.0Yes5575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51 48.5 28.0 -20.5 51.0Yes4175On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 48.0 34.0 -14.0 51.0No13625Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students15815699Yes15815699Yes757499Yes
High needs626198Yes626198Yes272696Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged454498Yes454498Yes21---
EL and Former EL2---2-------
Students w/ disabilities23---23---10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino9---9---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White14614499Yes14614499Yes706999Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles