Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Dighton-Rehoboth Regional High School
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Dighton-Rehoboth Regional High School
Organization Information
District:Dighton-Rehoboth (06500000)School type:High School
School:Dighton-Rehoboth Regional High School (06500505)Grades served:PK,09,10,11,12
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.5, Target = 99.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 97.5, Target = 99.5 75 or Higher All Students 99.1 99.5 97.5 -2.0 99.5 99.6 41206100Above Target
High needsCPI = 89.4, Target = 98.3 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 89.4, Target = 98.3 75 or Higher High needs 97.0 98.8 89.4 -9.4 98.3 98.5 15450Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 94.4, Target = 100 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 94.4, Target = 100 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 100.0 100.0 94.4 -5.6 100.0 100.0 37310Declined
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 97.3, Target = 99.5 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 97.3, Target = 99.5 75 or Higher White 99.2 99.5 97.3 -2.2 99.5 99.6 2218725No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.6, Target = 98 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 94.6, Target = 98 75 or Higher All Students 96.6 96.1 94.6 -1.5 98.0 98.3 6420525No Change
High needsCPI = 85.2, Target = 95.7 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 85.2, Target = 95.7 75 or Higher High needs 92.7 91.7 85.2 -6.5 95.7 96.4 63440Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 91.7, Target = 96.9 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 91.7, Target = 96.9 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 96.6 96.6 91.7 -4.9 96.9 98.3 80300Declined
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.8, Target = 98 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 94.8, Target = 98 75 or Higher White 96.6 95.9 94.8 -1.1 98.0 98.3 5618625No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.7, Target = 95.4 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 95.7, Target = 95.475 or Higher All Students 92.1 95.8 95.7 -0.1 95.4 96.1 7319875On Target
High needsCPI = 86.3, Target = 88 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 86.3, Target = 88 75 or Higher High needs 79.4 93.1 86.3 -6.8 88.0 89.7 61420Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 90.5, Target = 96.7 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 90.5, Target = 96.7 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 96.4 96.4 90.5 -5.9 96.7 98.2 77290Declined
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.4, Target = 95.3 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 95.4, Target = 95.375 or Higher White 92.0 95.7 95.4 -0.3 95.3 96.0 6418075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 63.2 62.12060 0.0 1.52060
High needs 45.2 31.1450 0.0 6.7450
Econ. Disadvantaged 58.6 45.2310 0.0 0.03125
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 62.2 61.51870 0.0 1.61870
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 60.6 58.52050 1.0 1.02050
High needs 40.5 34.1440 0.0 4.5440
Econ. Disadvantaged 55.2 43.3300 0.0 0.03025
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 59.9 60.21860 1.1 1.11860
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 29.5 37.919825 0.5 2.01980
High needs 15.0 14.3420 2.5 9.5420
Econ. Disadvantaged 21.4 17.2290 0.0 3.4290
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 28.8 37.818025 0.5 2.21800
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 64, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 64.0 64.0 0.0 51.0No188100Above Target
High needsSGP = 48, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 58.0 48.0 -10.0 51.0No3550Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 65, Target = 51 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 5175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 59.5 65.0 5.5 51.0No25100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 63.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 64.0 63.5 -0.5 51.0No172100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 52, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 49.0 52.0 3.0 51.0No18775On Target
High needsSGP = 60, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 50.0 60.0 10.0 51.0No34100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 62, Target = 51 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 5175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 53.0 62.0 9.0 51.0No25100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 51, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 51, Target = 5175 or Higher White 48.5 51.0 2.5 51.0No17175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 93.7, Target = 80 - All StudentsAll Students-Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.7, Target = 8075 or Higher All Students 97.1 93.7 -3.4 80.0 90.022275On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 83.6, Target = 80 - High needsHigh needs-Cohort Graduation Rate = 83.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 83.6, Target = 8075 or Higher High needs 94.4 83.6 -10.8 80.0 90.06775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.02--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.028--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.03--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.08--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.08--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 93, Target = 80 - WhiteWhite-Cohort Graduation Rate = 93, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 93, Target = 8075 or Higher White 97.4 93.0 -4.4 80.0 90.020175On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 97.6, Target = 85 - All StudentsAll Students-Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.6, Target = 8575 or Higher All Students 97.1 97.6 0.5 85.0 95.0205100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 95.8, Target = 85 - High needsHigh needs-Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.8, Target = 8575 or Higher High needs 95.2 95.8 0.6 85.0 95.072100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.039--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.04--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.03--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.06--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 97.9, Target = 85 - WhiteWhite-Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.9, Target = 8575 or Higher White 97.4 97.9 0.5 85.0 95.0191100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.6, Target = 0.8Dropout Rate 75 or Higher All Students 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.8 0.76685075On Target
High needsDropout Rate = 1.2, Target = 1.6Dropout Rate 75 or Higher High needs 2.8 2.3 1.2 1.1 1.6 1.46316475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  2.2---- 1.1-90--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------91--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------31--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------21--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.6, Target = 0.8Dropout Rate 75 or Higher White 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.8 0.75678175On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students21421199Yes21421199Yes214213100Yes
High needs514897Yes514897Yes5151100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged363396Yes363396Yes3636100Yes
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities24---24---24---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino11---11---11---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.10---10---10---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White19219099Yes19218998Yes19219199Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles