Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Blackstone Millville RHS
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Blackstone Millville RHS
Organization Information
District:Blackstone-Millville (06220000)School type:High School
School:Blackstone Millville RHS (06220505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 96.5, Target = 98.3CPI = 96.5, Target = 98.3CPI = 96.5, Target = 98.3 97.0 99.4 96.5 -2.9 98.3 98.5 291000Declined
High needsCPI = 92.3, Target = 93.3CPI = 92.3, Target = 93.3 88.5 98.2 92.3 -5.9 93.3 94.3 303975On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------26--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 97.1, Target = 98.4CPI = 97.1, Target = 98.4CPI = 97.1, Target = 98.4 97.2 99.3 97.1 -2.2 98.4 98.6 199525No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.8, Target = 95.9CPI = 85.8, Target = 95.9CPI = 85.8, Target = 95.9 93.0 95.9 85.8 -10.1 95.9 96.5 25970Declined
High needsCPI = 69.3, Target = 87.8CPI = 69.3, Target = 87.8CPI = 69.3, Target = 87.8 79.1 92.6 69.3 -23.3 87.8 89.6 9350Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.1, Target = 95.9CPI = 87.1, Target = 95.9CPI = 87.1, Target = 95.9 92.9 95.7 87.1 -8.6 95.9 96.5 11910Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.9, Target = 95.3CPI = 86.9, Target = 95.3CPI = 86.9, Target = 95.3 91.9 95.9 86.9 -9.0 95.3 96.0 27900Declined
High needsCPI = 71.9, Target = 88.6CPI = 71.9, Target = 88.6CPI = 71.9, Target = 88.6 80.5 89.4 71.9 -17.5 88.6 90.3 15320Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.7, Target = 95.6CPI = 88.7, Target = 95.6CPI = 88.7, Target = 95.6 92.4 95.8 88.7 -7.1 95.6 96.2 15840Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 57.3 46.01000 0.0 0.010025
High needs 35.7 25.6390 0.0 0.03925
Econ. Disadvantaged--26---26-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 56.6 48.4950 0.0 0.09525
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 60.0 50.5970 1.7 7.2970
High needs 33.3 31.4350 7.4 20.0350
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 59.5 53.8910 1.8 6.6910
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 25.2 27.89025 1.8 8.9900
High needs 15.4 21.93225 7.7 21.9320
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.0 29.88425 1.9 8.3840
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58.5, Target = 51SGP = 58.5, Target = 51SGP = 58.5, Target = 51 62.0 58.5 -3.5 51.0No9475On Target
High needsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 57.5 55.0 -2.5 51.0No3375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-22--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 62.0 58.0 -4.0 51.0No8975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 31.5, Target = 51SGP = 31.5, Target = 51SGP = 31.5, Target = 51 41.0 31.5 -9.5 51.0No9225Below Target
High needsSGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51 53.0 33.0 -20.0 51.0No3125Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51 40.5 30.0 -10.5 51.0No870Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.05-
High needs- 60.05-
EL and Former EL- 60.05-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 85.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 85.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 85.6, Target = 80 88.6 85.6 -3.0 80.0 90.010475On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 73.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 73.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 73.3, Target = 80 79.7 73.3 -6.4 80.0 90.0450Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.02--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.012--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.03--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.04--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 87.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 87.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 87.2, Target = 80 88.4 87.2 -1.2 80.0 90.09475On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 89.3, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.3, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.3, Target = 85 91.3 89.3 -2.0 85.0 95.014075On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 81.3, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 81.3, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 81.3, Target = 85 77.8 81.3 3.5 85.0 95.06450Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.022--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.05--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.04--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 89.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.1, Target = 85 92.1 89.1 -3.0 85.0 95.012975On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 1.5, Target = 1.1 1.8 1.8 1.5 0.3 1.1 0.94045325No Change
High needsDropout Rate = 2.7, Target = 0.5 0.8 4.1 2.7 1.4 0.5 0.43911250Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------69--
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilities -------55--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 1.7, Target = 1 1.7 1.8 1.7 0.1 1.0 0.92642325No Change
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students10210199Yes1019897Yes1009999Yes
High needs3939100Yes383594No373697Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged2626100Yes25---24---
EL and Former EL1---1---1---
Students w/ disabilities22---22---21---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1---1---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino2---2---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White9696100Yes959297Yes949399Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles