Massachusetts School and District Profiles

W.E.B. Du Bois Regional Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Monument Valley Regional Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Berkshire Hills (06180000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Monument Valley Regional Middle School (06180310)

Grades served:

05,06,07,08

Region:

Berkshires +

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		91.0	90.4	90.3	-0.1	94.8	95.5	51	368	25	No Change
High needs		82.4	83.7	83.7	0.0	89.7	91.2	72	146	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		87.8	87.8	85.8	-2.0	88.8	93.9	63	100	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		74.2	66.0	69.3	3.3	85.0	87.1	51	57	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		81.8	-	84.4	0.5	86.4	90.9	61	32	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		91.2	90.9	90.8	-0.1	94.9	95.6	40	311	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		77.0	72.3	73.9	1.6	86.6	88.5	33	371	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		61.8	61.0	62.1	1.1	77.7	80.9	45	149	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		64.6	64.6	67.2	2.6	67.6	82.3	47	103	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		50.0	40.2	41.5	1.3	70.8	75.0	20	59	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		70.5	-	57.0	-10.7	77.9	85.3	20	32	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		77.6	73.7	75.5	1.8	86.9	88.8	23	313	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.0	74.9	71.7	-3.2	88.9	90.5	38	180	0	Declined
High needs		74.5	65.4	64.6	-0.8	85.1	87.3	70	70	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		65.9	65.9	65.5	-0.4	68.7	83.0	62	50	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		70.5	-	52.1	-7.9	82.8	85.3	53	24	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		82.1	76.3	73.1	-3.2	89.6	91.1	28	154	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	19.9	21.5	368	0	4.1	4.9	368	0
High needs	10.3	11.6	146	25	7.5	10.3	146	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	9.9	12.0	100	25	4.5	10.0	100	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Students w/ disabilities	8.0	8.8	57	25	20.0	22.8	57	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	9.7	3.1	32	0	6.5	6.3	32	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
White	20.9	24.1	311	25	4.4	4.8	311	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	16.6	21.3	371	25	19.0	19.7	371	0
High needs	5.5	10.1	149	25	31.5	33.6	149	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.2	11.7	103	25	28.8	27.2	103	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	3.4	59	25	58.8	61.0	59	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	6.5	3.1	32	0	25.8	37.5	32	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
White	17.8	23.0	313	25	17.8	17.9	313	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	5.1	4.4	180	0	14.1	12.2	180	25
High needs	4.4	1.4	70	0	23.5	18.6	70	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.8	2.0	50	0	19.2	16.0	50	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Students w/ disabilities	3.3	0.0	24	0	26.7	41.7	24	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	5.6	5.2	154	0	12.4	9.7	154	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		56.0	46.0	-10.0	51.0	No	361	50	Below Target
High needs		54.0	43.5	-10.5	51.0	No	140	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		56.5	41.0	-15.5	51.0	No	96	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		49.5	47.0	-2.5	51.0	Yes	56	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	29	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
White		55.0	47.0	-8.0	51.0	No	308	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		41.0	50.0	9.0	51.0	No	363	50	Below Target
High needs		33.5	41.0	7.5	51.0	No	143	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		33.0	44.5	11.5	51.0	No	100	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		24.5	29.5	5.0	51.0	No	58	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	29	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
White		41.0	51.0	10.0	51.0	No	309	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	1.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	1.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	1.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	400	377	96	Yes	401	383	96	Yes	195	182	96	Yes
High needs	162	152	96	Yes	163	158	97	Yes	78	71	94	No
Econ. Disadvantaged	113	104	95	Yes	114	110	96	Yes	57	50	93	No
EL and Former EL	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	65	60	95	Yes	65	62	95	Yes	28	25	92	No
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	34	34	100	Yes	35	35	100	Yes	17	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	339	318	97	Yes	339	322	95	Yes	166	156	97	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.