Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lura A. White Elementary School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Lura A. White Elementary School
Organization Information
District:Ayer Shirley School District (06160000)School type:Elementary School
School:Lura A. White Elementary School (06160001)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.5, Target = 90.4CPI = 83.5, Target = 90.4CPI = 83.5, Target = 90.4 83.5 83.8 83.5 -0.3 90.4 91.8 4018225No Change
High needsCPI = 71.6, Target = 83.3CPI = 71.6, Target = 83.3CPI = 71.6, Target = 83.3 71.3 73.1 71.6 -1.5 83.3 85.7 306725No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75, Target = 79.8CPI = 75, Target = 79.8CPI = 75, Target = 79.8 78.0 78.0 75.0 -3.0 79.8 89.0 41380Declined
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 62.5, Target = 72.3CPI = 62.5, Target = 72.3CPI = 62.5, Target = 72.3 52.5 60.6 62.5 1.9 72.3 76.3 444250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 83.6, Target = 90.8CPI = 83.6, Target = 90.8CPI = 83.6, Target = 90.8 84.2 82.9 83.6 0.7 90.8 92.1 2515250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.9, Target = 90.3CPI = 87.9, Target = 90.3CPI = 87.9, Target = 90.3 83.3 78.3 87.9 9.6 90.3 91.7 6118250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 75, Target = 84.5CPI = 75, Target = 84.5CPI = 75, Target = 84.5 73.4 67.9 75.0 7.1 84.5 86.7 466750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 77, Target = 71.8CPI = 77, Target = 71.8CPI = 77, Target = 71.8 69.2 69.2 77.0 7.8 71.8 84.6 5238100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 69, Target = 77CPI = 69, Target = 77CPI = 69, Target = 77 60.5 60.6 69.0 8.4 77.0 80.3 634250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 88.3, Target = 89.9CPI = 88.3, Target = 89.9CPI = 88.3, Target = 89.9 82.7 77.8 88.3 10.5 89.9 91.4 5215250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.3, Target = 88.6CPI = 88.3, Target = 88.6 80.4 83.3 88.3 5.0 88.6 90.2 766675On Target
High needs  65.7---- 82.9-21--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 87.3, Target = 88.3CPI = 87.3, Target = 88.3 80.0 83.1 87.3 4.2 88.3 90.0 625375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.5 10.41820 5.1 6.01820
High needs 4.6 3.0670 12.3 11.9670
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.3 0.0380 9.8 10.5380
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 2.44225 18.2 19.0420
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--16---16-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 10.0 8.61520 4.6 5.91520
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 19.0 32.418225 8.2 6.618225
High needs 7.5 16.46725 16.4 16.4670
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.0 15.83825 11.6 15.8380
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities 6.1 7.14225 24.2 19.04225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--16---16-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 18.0 32.215225 7.5 5.315225
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.9 16.76625 2.4 4.5660
High needs--21---21-
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--13---13-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 13.5 17.05325 2.7 5.7530
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 41.0 42.0 1.0 51.0No11350Below Target
High needsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 28.0 39.0 11.0 51.0No4175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-27--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 39.0 45.0 6.0 51.0No9550Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51 40.5 60.5 20.0 51.0Yes114100Above Target
High needsSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 44.0 68.0 24.0 51.0Yes41100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-24--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 41.5 60.0 18.5 51.0Yes97100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.04-
High needs- 60.04-
EL and Former EL- 60.04-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students18818598Yes18818598Yes6767100Yes
High needs716896Yes716896Yes2121100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged393897Yes393897Yes13---
EL and Former EL5---5---1---
Students w/ disabilities454296Yes454296Yes13---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2-------
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---3---
Hispanic/Latino17---17---7---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White15715498Yes15715498Yes5454100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles