Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Athol-Royalston Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Athol-Royalston Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Athol-Royalston (06150000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Athol-Royalston Middle School (06150305)

Grades served:

05,06,07,08

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		85.1	74.1	71.8	-2.3	91.3	92.6	7	376	25	No Change
High needs		80.4	66.0	63.3	-2.7	88.6	90.2	5	225	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		67.2	67.2	64.9	-2.3	69.9	83.6	5	183	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		69.2	58.0	51.9	-6.1	82.0	84.6	10	105	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		75.0	-	-	-	-	87.5	-	26	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		85.5	74.1	73.5	-0.6	91.5	92.8	2	333	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		73.7	62.0	61.8	-0.2	84.7	86.9	10	372	25	No Change
High needs		66.7	53.7	54.3	0.6	80.6	83.4	11	221	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		55.0	55.0	57.0	2.0	58.8	77.5	12	181	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		52.1	43.4	42.2	-1.2	72.1	76.1	23	102	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		64.1	-	-	-	-	82.1	-	26	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		74.9	62.6	63.7	1.1	85.4	87.5	4	329	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		71.5	69.1	64.8	-4.3	83.4	85.8	23	171	0	Declined
High needs		67.2	63.2	61.7	-1.5	80.9	83.6	53	107	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		64.4	64.4	64.2	-0.2	67.4	82.2	57	83	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		58.2	55.6	50.5	-5.1	75.6	79.1	44	49	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		71.3	69.5	66.3	-3.2	83.3	85.7	11	150	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	5.2	0.8	376	0	15.7	14.9	376	0
High needs	2.7	0.4	225	0	24.1	21.8	225	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.7	0.5	183	0	22.4	20.2	183	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.9	0.0	105	0	33.0	36.2	105	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	26	-	-	-	26	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	5.0	0.9	333	0	16.6	14.1	333	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	6.0	10.8	372	25	30.6	33.1	372	0
High needs	1.8	5.0	221	25	42.2	41.2	221	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.2	5.5	181	25	41.3	38.7	181	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.9	2.0	102	0	58.5	55.9	102	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	26	-	-	-	26	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	6.6	11.2	329	25	30.3	29.8	329	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.6	2.9	171	25	13.7	23.4	171	0
High needs	2.8	1.9	107	0	20.8	24.3	107	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.5	2.4	83	0	17.6	20.5	83	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.9	0.0	49	0	31.5	38.8	49	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	1.8	3.3	150	25	13.8	20.7	150	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		44.0	37.0	-7.0	51.0	No	352	25	Below Target
High needs		44.0	32.0	-12.0	51.0	No	206	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		41.0	33.0	-8.0	51.0	No	170	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		53.0	33.0	-20.0	51.0	No	90	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		44.0	38.0	-6.0	51.0	No	311	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		42.0	44.0	2.0	51.0	No	355	50	Below Target
High needs		42.5	44.0	1.5	51.0	No	206	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		39.0	46.5	7.5	51.0	No	170	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		47.0	47.0	0.0	51.0	No	91	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		43.0	45.0	2.0	51.0	No	314	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	3.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	3.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	3.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	394	385	98	Yes	396	384	97	Yes	192	177	95	Yes
High needs	239	230	96	Yes	239	227	95	Yes	124	111	94	No
Econ. Disadvantaged	195	187	96	Yes	195	186	95	Yes	96	86	94	No
EL and Former EL	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	109	107	98	Yes	109	104	95	Yes	56	51	95	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	27	26	96	Yes	27	26	96	Yes	14	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	10	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	349	341	98	Yes	349	338	97	Yes	171	156	95	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.