Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Overlook Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Overlook Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Ashburnham-Westminster (06100000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Overlook Middle School (06100305)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		93.1	93.1	93.3	0.2	96.0	96.6	67	555	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		83.1	82.5	83.5	1.0	90.1	91.6	71	156	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		89.8	89.8	91.0	1.2	90.7	94.9	86	81	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		72.5	73.6	74.2	0.6	84.0	86.3	65	92	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		92.8	93.2	93.2	0.0	95.8	96.4	58	527	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		79.3	83.8	85.9	2.1	87.9	89.7	74	555	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		64.2	69.4	72.1	2.7	79.1	82.1	86	155	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		74.7	74.7	78.7	4.0	76.8	87.4	89	81	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		54.9	58.4	59.3	0.9	73.7	77.5	78	91	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		79.3	84.1	85.9	1.8	87.9	89.7	67	527	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		82.1	78.9	81.8	2.9	89.6	91.1	76	185	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		70.3	61.6	68.4	6.8	82.7	85.2	81	49	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		69.2	69.2	70.5	1.3	71.8	84.6	81	33	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		64.8	54.1	55.6	1.5	79.5	82.4	64	27	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		82.6	78.8	81.6	2.8	89.9	91.3	67	174	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	16.5	17.3	555	0	3.1	2.3	555	25
High needs	6.4	6.4	156	0	10.2	7.7	156	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.2	9.9	81	0	5.7	2.5	81	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.1	2.2	92	25	17.4	13.0	92	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	16.9	17.1	527	0	3.3	2.3	527	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	26.2	29.4	555	25	9.6	7.9	555	25
High needs	9.6	12.9	155	25	24.4	20.0	155	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	12.6	19.8	81	25	16.1	11.1	81	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Students w/ disabilities	4.3	4.4	91	0	37.0	34.1	91	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	25.9	28.8	527	25	9.2	8.0	527	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	4.8	7.0	185	25	11.3	6.5	185	25
High needs	3.4	2.0	49	0	29.3	18.4	49	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.3	0.0	33	0	16.7	18.2	33	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.7	3.7	27	25	40.5	29.6	27	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	5.2	7.5	174	25	11.0	6.9	174	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		65.0	59.0	-6.0	51.0	No	531	75	On Target
High needs		57.0	58.0	1.0	51.0	Yes	149	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		60.0	60.0	0.0	51.0	Yes	79	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		53.5	55.5	2.0	51.0	No	86	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		64.0	59.0	-5.0	51.0	No	503	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		63.0	67.0	4.0	51.0	No	523	100	Above Target
High needs		60.5	66.0	5.5	51.0	No	145	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		60.5	67.0	6.5	51.0	No	77	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		60.0	63.0	3.0	51.0	No	83	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		63.0	67.0	4.0	51.0	No	496	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	1.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	1.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	1.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	568	561	99	Yes	568	562	99	Yes	187	186	99	Yes
High needs	162	158	98	Yes	162	158	98	Yes	50	49	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	86	84	98	Yes	86	84	98	Yes	33	33	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	11	-	-	-	11	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	94	92	98	Yes	94	91	97	Yes	28	27	96	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	15	-	-	-	15	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	538	531	99	Yes	538	532	99	Yes	176	175	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.