Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Westminster Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Westminster Elementary
Organization Information
District:Ashburnham-Westminster (06100000)School type:Elementary School
School:Westminster Elementary (06100005)Grades served:02,03,04,05
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.2, Target = 91.8CPI = 86.2, Target = 91.8CPI = 86.2, Target = 91.8 86.0 80.9 86.2 5.3 91.8 93.0 5227850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 72.9, Target = 84.4CPI = 72.9, Target = 84.4CPI = 72.9, Target = 84.4 73.2 67.6 72.9 5.3 84.4 86.6 368450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.8, Target = 71.5CPI = 78.8, Target = 71.5CPI = 78.8, Target = 71.5 68.9 68.9 78.8 9.9 71.5 84.5 5946100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 59.7, Target = 79.4CPI = 59.7, Target = 79.4CPI = 59.7, Target = 79.4 64.7 59.6 59.7 0.1 79.4 82.4 354450Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.2, Target = 91.6CPI = 87.2, Target = 91.6CPI = 87.2, Target = 91.6 85.6 81.8 87.2 5.4 91.6 92.8 4525250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.5, Target = 87.9CPI = 89.5, Target = 87.9CPI = 89.5, Target = 87.9 79.3 83.7 89.5 5.8 87.9 89.7 68279100Above Target
High needsCPI = 78.2, Target = 78.9CPI = 78.2, Target = 78.9 63.8 69.1 78.2 9.1 78.9 81.9 608575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.2, Target = 75.8CPI = 83.2, Target = 75.8CPI = 83.2, Target = 75.8 73.6 73.6 83.2 9.6 75.8 86.8 7846100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 67.2, Target = 75CPI = 67.2, Target = 75CPI = 67.2, Target = 75 57.1 59.6 67.2 7.6 75.0 78.6 594550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.8, Target = 87.9CPI = 90.8, Target = 87.9CPI = 90.8, Target = 87.9 79.2 84.7 90.8 6.1 87.9 89.6 67253100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.7, Target = 84.3CPI = 85.7, Target = 84.3CPI = 85.7, Target = 84.3 73.1 78.7 85.7 7.0 84.3 86.6 6689100Above Target
High needsCPI = 78, Target = 79CPI = 78, Target = 79 64.0- 78.0 -0.8 79.0 82.0 822575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.7, Target = 84.5CPI = 85.7, Target = 84.5CPI = 85.7, Target = 84.5 73.5 78.9 85.7 6.8 84.5 86.8 538275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 4.6 10.827825 7.3 6.527825
High needs 1.2 4.88425 14.8 17.9840
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 6.54625 10.8 6.54625
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 2.1 2.3440 25.5 34.1440
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--16---16-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 4.6 11.525225 7.1 6.025225
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.9 33.327925 7.3 3.927925
High needs 6.2 14.18525 19.8 10.68525
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.4 15.24625 13.5 6.54625
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 4.3 8.94525 34.0 20.04525
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--16---16-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 17.6 34.825325 6.7 3.625325
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 6.0 21.38925 6.0 4.58925
High needs 21.2 16.0250 9.1 12.0250
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 4.7 23.28225 6.3 4.98225
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 46.0 64.0 18.0 51.0Yes188100Above Target
High needsSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 36.0 61.0 25.0 51.0Yes53100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-30--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 43.0 43.0 0.0 51.0No2350Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 46.0 65.0 19.0 51.0Yes169100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51 67.0 72.0 5.0 51.0Yes189100Above Target
High needsSGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51 59.0 72.0 13.0 51.0Yes54100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-30--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 71.5, Target = 51SGP = 71.5, Target = 51SGP = 71.5, Target = 51 51.0 71.5 20.5 51.0Yes24100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51 67.5 72.0 4.5 51.0Yes170100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03-
High needs- 60.03-
EL and Former EL- 60.03-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students28628399Yes28628499Yes919099Yes
High needs898697Yes898798Yes272696Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged484798Yes484798Yes15---
EL and Former EL8---8---4---
Students w/ disabilities484596Yes484696Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian2---2---1---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2-------
Hispanic/Latino17---17---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White25925799Yes259258100Yes848399Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles