Massachusetts School and District Profiles

C.T. Douglas Elementary School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - C.T. Douglas Elementary School

Organization Information
District:Acton-Boxborough (06000000)School type:Elementary School
School:C.T. Douglas Elementary School (06000020)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.4, Target = 97.8CPI = 92.4, Target = 97.8CPI = 92.4, Target = 97.8 96.3 94.9 92.4 -2.5 97.8 98.2 8127875On Target
High needsCPI = 82.1, Target = 93.6CPI = 82.1, Target = 93.6CPI = 82.1, Target = 93.6 89.1 85.8 82.1 -3.7 93.6 94.6 79910Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL  83.7---- 91.9-26--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 77.3, Target = 93.4CPI = 77.3, Target = 93.4CPI = 77.3, Target = 93.4 88.6 82.5 77.3 -5.2 93.4 94.3 83640Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 92.2, Target = 97.8CPI = 92.2, Target = 97.8CPI = 92.2, Target = 97.8 96.2 93.2 92.2 -1.0 97.8 98.1 426475On Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------23--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92, Target = 97.8CPI = 92, Target = 97.8CPI = 92, Target = 97.8 96.2 95.9 92.0 -3.9 97.8 98.1 721820Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.7, Target = 97.1CPI = 89.7, Target = 97.1CPI = 89.7, Target = 97.1 95.0 91.9 89.7 -2.2 97.1 97.5 6927825No Change
High needsCPI = 76.9, Target = 92.2CPI = 76.9, Target = 92.2CPI = 76.9, Target = 92.2 86.6 79.6 76.9 -2.7 92.2 93.3 55920Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL  88.0---- 94.0-26--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 70.4, Target = 90.7CPI = 70.4, Target = 90.7CPI = 70.4, Target = 90.7 84.1 74.1 70.4 -3.7 90.7 92.1 66650Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 92.2, Target = 99.1CPI = 92.2, Target = 99.1CPI = 92.2, Target = 99.1 98.5 93.6 92.2 -1.4 99.1 99.3 316475On Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------24--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.1, Target = 96.9CPI = 89.1, Target = 96.9CPI = 89.1, Target = 96.9 94.7 91.7 89.1 -2.6 96.9 97.4 561810Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.1, Target = 95.8CPI = 89.1, Target = 95.8CPI = 89.1, Target = 95.8 92.8 89.7 89.1 -0.6 95.8 96.4 807175On Target
High needs -------24--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------1--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian  96.3---- 98.2-26--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.4, Target = 94.8CPI = 90.4, Target = 94.8CPI = 90.4, Target = 94.8 91.1 87.5 90.4 2.9 94.8 95.6 773975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 26.9 22.32780 0.7 3.22780
High needs 7.4 16.59125 2.5 9.9910
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--26---26-
Students w/ disabilities 7.0 4.7640 3.5 12.5640
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 31.8 34.4640 3.0 4.7640
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--23---23-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.1 18.71820 0.0 3.31820
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 44.2 46.42780 3.2 5.02780
High needs 19.8 23.99225 11.1 15.2920
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--26---26-
Students w/ disabilities 15.8 13.8650 15.8 18.5650
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 62.1 70.36425 4.5 6.3640
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--24---24-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 37.2 37.01810 2.7 5.01810
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 24.7 25.4710 4.1 2.87125
High needs--24---24-
Econ. Disadvantaged--1---1-
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--26---26-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 16.7 17.9390 6.3 2.63925
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 59.0 60.0 1.0 51.0No204100Above Target
High needsSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 59.5 59.0 -0.5 51.0No7075On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-22--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 57.0 43.0 -14.0 51.0No4950Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 56.5 67.0 10.5 51.0No47100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 61.0 60.0 -1.0 51.0No132100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 58.0 68.0 10.0 51.0No205100Above Target
High needsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 48.5 58.0 9.5 51.0No7175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-12--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-22--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51 40.0 55.5 15.5 51.0No50100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 74.0 61.0 -13.0 51.0No47100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 70.5, Target = 51SGP = 70.5, Target = 51SGP = 70.5, Target = 51 52.5 70.5 18.0 51.0No132100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 93.0 60.02525
High needs 93.0 60.02525
EL and Former EL 93.0 60.025-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students29128598Yes29128598Yes7373100Yes
High needs979598Yes979699Yes2525100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged17---17---1---
EL and Former EL2828100Yes2828100Yes8---
Students w/ disabilities676597Yes676699Yes19---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian6767100Yes6767100Yes2727100Yes
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino9---9---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.26---26---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White18818397Yes18818297Yes3939100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles