Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Merriam School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Merriam School

Organization Information
District:Acton-Boxborough (06000000)School type:Elementary School
School:Merriam School (06000010)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.3, Target = 96.3CPI = 92.3, Target = 96.3CPI = 92.3, Target = 96.3 93.6 92.2 92.3 0.1 96.3 96.8 8031375On Target
High needsCPI = 78.6, Target = 89.3CPI = 78.6, Target = 89.3CPI = 78.6, Target = 89.3 81.6 78.2 78.6 0.4 89.3 90.8 647750Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL -------19--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 76.7, Target = 89.7CPI = 76.7, Target = 89.7CPI = 76.7, Target = 89.7 82.4 75.0 76.7 1.7 89.7 91.2 826050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 97, Target = 97CPI = 97, Target = 97 94.9 97.1 97.0 -0.1 97.0 97.5 8376100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.2, Target = 96.3CPI = 92.2, Target = 96.3CPI = 92.2, Target = 96.3 93.7 90.8 92.2 1.4 96.3 96.9 7420875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.6, Target = 97CPI = 90.6, Target = 97CPI = 90.6, Target = 97 94.8 91.2 90.6 -0.6 97.0 97.4 7431225No Change
High needsCPI = 73.7, Target = 90.3CPI = 73.7, Target = 90.3CPI = 73.7, Target = 90.3 83.3 74.4 73.7 -0.7 90.3 91.7 417725No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL -------19--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 70.4, Target = 89.6CPI = 70.4, Target = 89.6CPI = 70.4, Target = 89.6 82.1 71.8 70.4 -1.4 89.6 91.1 666025No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 97, Target = 98.5CPI = 97, Target = 98.5CPI = 97, Target = 98.5 97.5 97.3 97.0 -0.3 98.5 98.8 6475100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.3, Target = 96.7CPI = 90.3, Target = 96.7CPI = 90.3, Target = 96.7 94.4 90.4 90.3 -0.1 96.7 97.2 6420825No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.5, Target = 91.5CPI = 88.5, Target = 91.5CPI = 88.5, Target = 91.5 85.4 88.3 88.5 0.2 91.5 92.7 778950Improved Below Target
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------3--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 92.4, Target = 97.1CPI = 92.4, Target = 97.1CPI = 92.4, Target = 97.1 95.0 94.6 92.4 -2.2 97.1 97.5 3823100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.2, Target = 91.9CPI = 89.2, Target = 91.9CPI = 89.2, Target = 91.9 86.1 87.9 89.2 1.3 91.9 93.1 715875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 23.9 16.93130 2.5 2.63130
High needs 2.6 3.97725 9.0 10.4770
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--19---19-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 3.36025 10.0 11.7600
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 41.6 30.3760 1.3 0.07625
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--16---16-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 17.7 12.52080 2.3 1.920825
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 44.4 39.13120 3.4 3.53120
High needs 16.3 9.1770 13.8 14.3770
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--19---19-
Students w/ disabilities 8.1 5.0600 16.1 16.7600
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 70.7 70.7750 0.0 0.07525
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--16---16-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 36.9 29.82080 2.8 3.42080
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 22.3 27.08925 4.3 4.5890
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--3---3-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 35.7 47.82325 0.0 0.02325
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.3 17.2580 3.3 3.4580
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 64.0 57.0 -7.0 51.0No23675On Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 62.0 49.0 -13.0 51.0No5750Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-10--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-16--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 57.0 48.0 -9.0 51.0No4550Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 79.5 53.0 -26.5 51.0No5975On Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 61.0 58.0 -3.0 51.0Yes15975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 63.0 61.0 -2.0 51.0No237100Above Target
High needsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 62.0 58.0 -4.0 51.0No5975On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-10--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-16--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 54.0 58.0 4.0 51.0No4775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51 70.0 72.0 2.0 51.0No58100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51 58.0 57.5 -0.5 51.0No16075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.017-
High needs- 60.017-
EL and Former EL- 60.017-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students32632499Yes33032799Yes9595100Yes
High needs848298Yes848298Yes19---
Econ. Disadvantaged18---18---3---
EL and Former EL22---22---6---
Students w/ disabilities626097Yes626097Yes14---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian8080100Yes818099Yes2626100Yes
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---3---
Hispanic/Latino17---17---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---11---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White21120999Yes21421299Yes6060100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles