Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Alma del Mar Charter School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Alma del Mar Charter School

Organization Information

District:

Alma del Mar Charter School (District) (04090000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Alma del Mar Charter School (04090205)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05,06

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Insufficient data

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		82.1	78.0	86.9	8.9	86.6	91.1	56	164	75	On Target
High needs		81.1	76.2	82.9	6.7	85.8	90.6	81	114	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		77.3	77.3	83.9	6.6	79.2	88.7	83	93	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		67.9	72.4	71.6	-0.8	73.3	84.0	68	29	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		75.0	-	-	-	-	87.5	-	28	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		81.8	75.0	84.6	9.6	84.8	90.9	90	65	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		88.8	83.1	87.3	4.2	90.7	94.4	46	57	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		91.7	81.4	83.8	2.4	93.8	95.9	43	164	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		90.2	79.8	79.8	0.0	92.7	95.1	67	114	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		81.1	81.1	80.1	-1.0	82.7	90.6	67	93	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		71.4	69.8	69.8	0.0	76.2	85.7	65	29	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		81.3	-	-	-	-	90.7	-	28	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		84.8	74.5	78.5	4.0	87.3	92.4	70	65	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		92.5	90.6	89.0	-1.6	93.8	96.3	56	57	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		65.0	65.0	70.6	5.6	67.9	82.5	24	40	100	Above Target
High needs		63.0	63.0	64.3	1.3	66.1	81.5	39	28	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	4.2	7.9	164	25	4.2	4.9	164	0
High needs	2.4	7.9	114	25	4.8	7.0	114	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.0	7.5	93	25	3.0	6.5	93	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Students w/ disabilities	3.4	10.3	29	25	10.3	13.8	29	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	28	-	-	-	28	-
Hispanic/Latino	2.1	3.1	65	25	4.3	6.2	65	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	10.0	15.8	57	25	2.5	5.3	57	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	13.6	18.9	164	25	6.8	5.5	164	25
High needs	10.8	16.7	114	25	7.2	7.9	114	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.6	16.1	93	25	6.1	7.5	93	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Students w/ disabilities	10.3	6.9	29	0	10.3	13.8	29	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	28	-	-	-	28	-
Hispanic/Latino	12.8	15.4	65	25	8.5	7.7	65	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	22.5	26.3	57	25	5.0	3.5	57	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	2.5	40	25	25.0	17.5	40	25
High needs	0.0	3.6	28	25	29.6	25.0	28	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	24	-	-	-	24	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		16.0	54.0	38.0	51.0	Yes	119	100	Above Target
High needs		16.0	43.5	27.5	51.0	Yes	78	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		16.0	42.0	26.0	51.0	Yes	64	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		16.5	49.5	33.0	51.0	Yes	44	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	47	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		40.5	39.0	-1.5	51.0	Yes	119	75	On Target
High needs		45.0	37.5	-7.5	51.0	No	78	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		40.0	35.0	-5.0	51.0	No	64	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		37.5	34.5	-3.0	51.0	Yes	44	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	47	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	14.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	14.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	14.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	164	164	100	Yes	164	164	100	Yes	40	40	100	Yes
High needs	114	114	100	Yes	114	114	100	Yes	28	28	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	93	93	100	Yes	93	93	100	Yes	24	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	20	-	-	-	20	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	29	29	100	Yes	29	29	100	Yes	6	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	28	28	100	Yes	28	28	100	Yes	7	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	65	65	100	Yes	65	65	100	Yes	17	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	57	57	100	Yes	57	57	100	Yes	12	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.