Massachusetts School and District Profiles

West Tatnuck
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - West Tatnuck
Organization Information
District:Worcester (03480000)School type:Elementary School
School:West Tatnuck (03480260)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.7, Target = 94CPI = 94.7, Target = 94 89.7 94.6 94.7 0.1 94.0 94.9 93145100Above Target
High needsCPI = 90.2, Target = 89.4CPI = 90.2, Target = 89.4 81.9 91.1 90.2 -0.9 89.4 91.0 977475On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 91.2, Target = 95.7CPI = 91.2, Target = 95.7CPI = 91.2, Target = 95.7 95.3 95.3 91.2 -4.1 95.7 97.7 983775On Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 96.1, Target = 94.3CPI = 96.1, Target = 94.3CPI = 96.1, Target = 94.3 91.4 99.2 96.1 -3.1 94.3 95.7 9932100Above Target
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.6, Target = 94.2CPI = 95.6, Target = 94.2CPI = 95.6, Target = 94.2 90.1 95.7 95.6 -0.1 94.2 95.1 94103100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.3, Target = 93.1CPI = 94.3, Target = 93.1CPI = 94.3, Target = 93.1 88.2 93.0 94.3 1.3 93.1 94.1 91145100Above Target
High needsCPI = 89.9, Target = 87.6CPI = 89.9, Target = 87.6CPI = 89.9, Target = 87.6 78.8 87.5 89.9 2.4 87.6 89.4 9674100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 88.5, Target = 92.6CPI = 88.5, Target = 92.6CPI = 88.5, Target = 92.6 91.9 91.9 88.5 -3.4 92.6 96.0 933775On Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 95.3, Target = 91.1CPI = 95.3, Target = 91.1CPI = 95.3, Target = 91.1 86.7 98.3 95.3 -3.0 91.1 93.4 9732100Above Target
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.6, Target = 93.7CPI = 96.6, Target = 93.7CPI = 96.6, Target = 93.7 89.2 94.3 96.6 2.3 93.7 94.6 96103100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.4, Target = 92.7CPI = 86.4, Target = 92.7CPI = 86.4, Target = 92.7 87.5 91.4 86.4 -5.0 92.7 93.8 69350Declined
High needs -------17--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------7--
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87, Target = 94.5CPI = 87, Target = 94.5CPI = 87, Target = 94.5 90.6- 87.0 -0.5 94.5 95.3 602725No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 31.0 34.514525 3.2 2.114525
High needs 22.4 17.6740 6.6 4.17425
Econ. Disadvantaged 27.0 13.5370 2.7 2.7370
EL and Former EL 26.7 18.8320 0.0 0.03225
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 32.7 41.710325 2.7 1.910325
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 42.0 51.714525 3.8 3.414525
High needs 28.9 32.47425 7.9 6.87425
Econ. Disadvantaged 35.1 32.4370 2.7 5.4370
EL and Former EL 30.0 43.83225 0.0 3.1320
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 45.9 56.310325 2.8 1.910325
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 25.0 25.7350 0.0 8.6350
High needs--17---17-
Econ. Disadvantaged--7---7-
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 26.7 25.9270 0.0 11.1270
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 58.0 65.0 7.0 51.0No97100Above Target
High needsSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 58.0 61.0 3.0 51.0No43100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-19--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-9--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51 55.0 65.5 10.5 51.0No72100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 75, Target = 51SGP = 75, Target = 51SGP = 75, Target = 51 61.5 75.0 13.5 51.0Yes97100Above Target
High needsSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 62.0 63.0 1.0 51.0Yes43100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-19--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-9--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 78, Target = 51SGP = 78, Target = 51SGP = 78, Target = 51 62.5 78.0 15.5 51.0Yes72100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 73.0 60.04725
High needs 73.0 60.04725
EL and Former EL 73.0 60.04725
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students155155100Yes155155100Yes3737100Yes
High needs8282100Yes8282100Yes19---
Econ. Disadvantaged4444100Yes4444100Yes9---
EL and Former EL3232100Yes3232100Yes6---
Students w/ disabilities23---23---8---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian9---9---2---
Afr. Amer./Black13---13---2---
Hispanic/Latino15---15---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.10---10---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White108108100Yes108108100Yes2828100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles