Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Norrback Avenue

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Norrback Avenue

Organization Information

District:

Worcester (03480000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Norrback Avenue (03480202)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		72.4	78.0	80.4	2.4	83.9	86.2	28	274	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		65.2	73.3	73.8	0.5	79.7	82.6	40	183	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.0	72.0	73.8	1.8	74.3	86.0	35	121	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		58.6	75.0	71.3	-3.7	75.9	79.3	53	94	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		57.0	60.4	57.7	-2.7	74.9	78.5	30	71	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		67.1	78.1	81.1	3.0	80.8	83.6	80	49	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		62.1	68.2	69.1	0.9	77.9	81.1	34	76	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		78.1	81.8	86.3	4.5	87.2	89.1	39	126	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		70.3	73.6	76.0	2.4	82.7	85.2	17	276	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		63.5	67.6	70.8	3.2	78.7	81.8	28	185	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		65.9	65.9	71.1	5.2	68.7	83.0	29	123	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		59.4	69.4	69.7	0.3	76.3	79.7	37	94	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		53.1	58.0	55.2	-2.8	72.6	76.6	23	72	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		64.6	67.2	74.5	7.3	79.4	82.3	63	49	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		62.8	62.0	65.7	3.7	78.3	81.4	24	78	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		74.0	80.8	81.9	1.1	84.8	87.0	20	126	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		65.2	81.8	74.6	-7.2	79.7	82.6	33	66	0	Declined
High needs		57.5	75.5	71.4	-4.1	75.2	78.8	63	49	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		74.1	74.1	69.4	-4.7	76.3	87.1	59	36	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		48.9	-	-	-	-	74.5	-	29	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		75.0	88.7	77.5	-11.2	85.4	87.5	21	30	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	8.0	10.9	274	25	12.8	12.0	274	0
High needs	4.2	6.6	183	25	18.0	18.0	183	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.2	6.6	121	25	22.0	19.8	121	25
EL and Former EL	3.3	7.4	94	25	17.8	20.2	94	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	71	0	30.6	36.6	71	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Afr. Amer./Black	2.1	12.2	49	25	10.4	12.2	49	0
Hispanic/Latino	3.9	3.9	76	0	23.4	25.0	76	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	12.3	14.3	126	25	8.9	4.8	126	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	16.0	17.0	276	0	17.7	14.1	276	25
High needs	8.5	9.7	185	25	23.8	18.9	185	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	8.5	9.8	123	25	23.7	17.9	123	25
EL and Former EL	8.9	11.7	94	25	22.2	16.0	94	25
Students w/ disabilities	2.8	1.4	72	0	36.1	38.9	72	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Afr. Amer./Black	4.2	12.2	49	25	22.9	8.2	49	25
Hispanic/Latino	10.4	9.0	78	0	33.8	28.2	78	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	20.5	23.8	126	25	8.9	9.5	126	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	12.3	9.1	66	0	5.5	4.5	66	25
High needs	8.5	8.2	49	0	8.5	6.1	49	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.1	8.3	36	25	14.3	5.6	36	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	29	-	-	-	29	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	19.0	13.3	30	0	2.4	3.3	30	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		52.0	53.5	1.5	51.0	Yes	198	75	On Target
High needs		53.0	50.0	-3.0	51.0	No	128	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		51.0	49.0	-2.0	51.0	No	81	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		57.0	53.0	-4.0	51.0	No	69	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		47.5	40.0	-7.5	51.0	No	46	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		59.5	56.5	-3.0	51.0	Yes	38	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		62.0	50.0	-12.0	51.0	No	57	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		47.0	57.0	10.0	51.0	Yes	91	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		73.0	74.0	1.0	51.0	No	200	100	Above Target
High needs		69.5	69.0	-0.5	51.0	No	130	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		65.0	70.0	5.0	51.0	Yes	83	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		70.5	69.0	-1.5	51.0	No	70	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		67.0	67.5	0.5	51.0	No	46	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		63.0	63.0	0.0	51.0	No	39	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		75.0	75.0	0.0	51.0	No	58	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		73.0	80.0	7.0	51.0	No	91	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	50.0	60.0	107.00	0
High needs	50.0	60.0	107.00	0
EL and Former EL	50.0	60.0	107.00	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	282	280	99	Yes	283	283	100	Yes	68	68	100	Yes
High needs	191	189	99	Yes	192	192	100	Yes	51	51	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	129	127	98	Yes	130	130	100	Yes	38	38	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	98	98	100	Yes	99	99	100	Yes	31	31	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	76	75	99	Yes	76	76	100	Yes	14	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	52	52	100	Yes	52	52	100	Yes	14	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	80	78	98	Yes	81	81	100	Yes	18	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	127	127	100	Yes	127	127	100	Yes	30	30	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.