Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Nelson Place

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Nelson Place

Organization Information

District:

Worcester (03480000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Nelson Place (03480200)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05,06

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		89.9	85.5	88.2	2.7	94.1	95.0	62	272	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		83.2	76.5	79.8	3.3	90.2	91.6	69	130	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		76.1	76.1	79.8	3.7	78.1	88.1	64	62	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		85.0	86.1	87.5	1.4	91.3	92.5	92	52	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		60.8	57.4	64.7	7.3	77.1	80.4	50	56	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		72.8	-	-	-	-	86.4	-	26	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		75.0	75.9	85.0	9.1	81.3	87.5	90	35	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		90.7	87.4	87.6	0.2	94.6	95.4	48	182	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		89.5	80.3	84.5	4.2	93.9	94.8	46	271	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		84.8	71.8	76.0	4.2	91.1	92.4	51	129	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.1	72.1	77.5	5.4	74.4	86.1	54	61	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		83.6	83.8	85.6	1.8	90.4	91.8	81	52	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		68.3	52.5	64.3	11.8	81.5	84.2	49	56	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		82.6	-	-	-	-	91.3	-	26	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		78.4	81.9	82.9	1.0	83.8	89.2	81	35	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		90.4	80.1	84.8	4.7	94.4	95.2	32	181	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		88.3	79.4	73.4	-6.0	93.2	94.2	30	62	0	Declined
High needs		82.0	69.4	62.1	-7.3	89.5	91.0	33	33	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		92.6	77.9	73.1	-4.8	95.7	96.3	14	40	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.2	15.8	272	25	8.3	4.4	272	25
High needs	3.1	6.9	130	25	15.3	9.2	130	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.9	6.5	62	25	16.2	9.7	62	25
EL and Former EL	5.6	9.6	52	25	3.7	1.9	52	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	1.8	56	25	35.3	21.4	56	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	26	-	-	-	26	-
Hispanic/Latino	10.3	17.1	35	25	20.7	5.7	35	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	10.9	15.4	182	25	6.0	4.4	182	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	19.2	19.9	271	0	11.3	6.3	271	25
High needs	13.7	12.4	129	0	18.3	11.6	129	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	13.2	11.5	61	0	19.1	11.5	61	25
EL and Former EL	22.2	19.2	52	0	5.6	1.9	52	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	5.4	56	25	43.1	23.2	56	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	26	-	-	-	26	-
Hispanic/Latino	20.7	14.3	35	0	10.3	8.6	35	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	20.2	19.9	181	0	12.0	5.5	181	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	9.5	12.9	62	25	8.1	14.5	62	0
High needs	6.5	6.1	33	0	12.9	27.3	33	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	9.6	15.0	40	25	9.6	15.0	40	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		54.0	60.0	6.0	51.0	Yes	194	100	Above Target
High needs		50.5	53.0	2.5	51.0	No	87	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		44.0	48.0	4.0	51.0	No	39	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		58.0	67.5	9.5	51.0	No	36	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		42.5	48.0	5.5	51.0	No	31	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		54.0	57.0	3.0	51.0	No	131	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		37.5	58.0	20.5	51.0	Yes	195	100	Above Target
High needs		29.0	50.0	21.0	51.0	No	89	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		22.0	38.5	16.5	51.0	No	40	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		39.0	54.0	15.0	51.0	No	36	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		28.0	55.0	27.0	51.0	No	33	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		36.0	60.0	24.0	51.0	Yes	132	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	73.0	60.0	51.00	25
High needs	73.0	60.0	51.00	25
EL and Former EL	73.0	60.0	51.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	278	277	100	Yes	279	278	100	Yes	64	64	100	Yes
High needs	136	135	99	Yes	137	136	99	Yes	35	35	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	66	65	98	Yes	67	66	99	Yes	17	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	57	56	98	Yes	57	57	100	Yes	14	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	58	58	100	Yes	58	58	100	Yes	15	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	20	-	-	-	20	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	28	28	100	Yes	29	29	100	Yes	10	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	36	36	100	Yes	36	36	100	Yes	9	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	184	183	99	Yes	184	183	99	Yes	40	40	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.