Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lincoln Street

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Lincoln Street

Organization Information
District:Worcester (03480000)School type:Elementary School
School:Lincoln Street (03480160)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 61.7, Target = 77CPI = 61.7, Target = 77CPI = 61.7, Target = 77 60.5 60.3 61.7 1.4 77.0 80.3 211150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 59.2, Target = 77CPI = 59.2, Target = 77CPI = 59.2, Target = 77 60.5 57.9 59.2 1.3 77.0 80.3 39850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 59.5, Target = 60CPI = 59.5, Target = 60 56.4 56.4 59.5 3.1 60.0 78.2 39275On Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 60.5, Target = 72.9CPI = 60.5, Target = 72.9CPI = 60.5, Target = 72.9 53.5 56.0 60.5 4.5 72.9 76.8 206250Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 38.8, Target = 60.4CPI = 38.8, Target = 60.4CPI = 38.8, Target = 60.4 32.1 33.6 38.8 5.2 60.4 66.1 32950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------18--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 57.1, Target = 76CPI = 57.1, Target = 76CPI = 57.1, Target = 76 58.8 55.7 57.1 1.4 76.0 79.4 67050Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------13--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 54.1, Target = 77.7CPI = 54.1, Target = 77.7CPI = 54.1, Target = 77.7 61.7 55.8 54.1 -1.7 77.7 80.9 111025No Change
High needsCPI = 51, Target = 77.7CPI = 51, Target = 77.7CPI = 51, Target = 77.7 61.7 54.9 51.0 -3.9 77.7 80.9 1970Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 51.1, Target = 56.6CPI = 51.1, Target = 56.6CPI = 51.1, Target = 56.6 52.7 52.7 51.1 -1.6 56.6 76.4 29125No Change
EL and Former ELCPI = 48.4, Target = 77.6CPI = 48.4, Target = 77.6CPI = 48.4, Target = 77.6 61.6 54.7 48.4 -6.3 77.6 80.8 3610Declined
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 30.4, Target = 61.4CPI = 30.4, Target = 61.4CPI = 30.4, Target = 61.4 33.9 44.8 30.4 -14.4 61.4 67.0 1280Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------18--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 48.6, Target = 78.5CPI = 48.6, Target = 78.5CPI = 48.6, Target = 78.5 63.2 50.7 48.6 -2.1 78.5 81.6 36925No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------13--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 46.7, Target = 70.3CPI = 46.7, Target = 70.3CPI = 46.7, Target = 70.3 49.0 57.7 46.7 -11.0 70.3 74.5 4230Declined
High needs  49.0---- 74.5-23--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL -------17--
Students w/ disabilities -------6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------1--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 2.8 2.71110 30.3 27.011125
High needs 3.0 3.1980 32.7 29.6980
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.3 3.3920 35.6 29.39225
EL and Former EL 0.0 3.26225 36.2 29.06225
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0290 69.0 62.12925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--18---18-
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 2.97025 34.8 32.9700
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--13---13-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 7.1 6.41100 34.8 40.01100
High needs 6.8 5.2970 35.9 43.3970
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.4 5.5910 38.0 42.9910
EL and Former EL 6.8 3.3610 37.3 44.3610
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0280 51.7 78.6280
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--18---18-
Hispanic/Latino 2.9 2.9690 42.6 46.4690
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--13---13-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 3.8 4.32325 26.9 43.5230
High needs--23---23-
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--17---17-
Students w/ disabilities--6---6-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--17---17-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--1---1-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 40.0 46.0 6.0 51.0No7250Below Target
High needsSGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51 41.0 47.5 6.5 51.0No6650Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 40.0 48.0 8.0 51.0No6050Below Target
EL and Former ELSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 38.5 48.0 9.5 51.0No4075On Target
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-12--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51 34.5 47.5 13.0 51.0No4875On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-8--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 43.0 46.0 3.0 51.0No7550Below Target
High needsSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 41.0 45.0 4.0 51.0No6950Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 38.0 46.0 8.0 51.0No6350Below Target
EL and Former ELSGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 51.5 45.5 -6.0 51.0No4250Below Target
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-12--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 37.0 46.0 9.0 51.0No5050Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-9--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 52.0 60.0930
High needs 52.0 60.0930
EL and Former EL 52.0 60.0930
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students126126100Yes12612599Yes2525100Yes
High needs113113100Yes11311299Yes2525100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged106106100Yes10610599Yes23---
EL and Former EL6868100Yes686799Yes17---
Students w/ disabilities3131100Yes313097Yes6---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian3---3-------
Afr. Amer./Black23---23---5---
Hispanic/Latino7474100Yes747399Yes17---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White18---18---2---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles