Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Muraco Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Muraco Elementary
Organization Information
District:Winchester (03440000)School type:Elementary School
School:Muraco Elementary (03440040)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.4, Target = 98.4CPI = 95.4, Target = 98.4CPI = 95.4, Target = 98.4 97.2 95.3 95.4 0.1 98.4 98.6 96219100Above Target
High needsCPI = 87.5, Target = 95.9CPI = 87.5, Target = 95.9CPI = 87.5, Target = 95.9 92.9 84.6 87.5 2.9 95.9 96.5 945275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL -------22--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 85.5, Target = 93.7CPI = 85.5, Target = 93.7CPI = 85.5, Target = 93.7 89.2 77.6 85.5 7.9 93.7 94.6 963175On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------3--
AsianCPI = 95.8, Target = 97.8CPI = 95.8, Target = 97.8CPI = 95.8, Target = 97.8 96.3 98.5 95.8 -2.7 97.8 98.2 6860100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95, Target = 98.7CPI = 95, Target = 98.7CPI = 95, Target = 98.7 97.8 95.0 95.0 0.0 98.7 98.9 91129100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.9, Target = 96.8CPI = 95.9, Target = 96.8 94.5 92.2 95.9 3.7 96.8 97.3 97218100Above Target
High needsCPI = 91.7, Target = 92.9CPI = 91.7, Target = 92.9CPI = 91.7, Target = 92.9 87.9 81.3 91.7 10.4 92.9 94.0 985175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL -------22--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 87.5, Target = 88.6CPI = 87.5, Target = 88.6CPI = 87.5, Target = 88.6 80.4 73.3 87.5 14.2 88.6 90.2 973075On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------3--
AsianCPI = 100, Target = 97.6CPI = 100, Target = 97.6CPI = 100, Target = 97.6 95.9 99.5 100.0 0.5 97.6 98.0 9660100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.3, Target = 96.9CPI = 94.3, Target = 96.9CPI = 94.3, Target = 96.9 94.7 90.6 94.3 3.7 96.9 97.4 87128100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.5, Target = 96.3CPI = 97.5, Target = 96.3CPI = 97.5, Target = 96.3 93.7 95.4 97.5 2.1 96.3 96.9 9970100Above Target
High needs -------13--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------1--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------18--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 97.3, Target = 95.3CPI = 97.3, Target = 95.3CPI = 97.3, Target = 95.3 92.0 95.4 97.3 1.9 95.3 96.0 9847100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 36.9 36.52190 1.9 0.921925
High needs 13.5 17.35225 7.7 1.95225
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--22---22-
Students w/ disabilities 6.9 9.73125 13.8 0.03125
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--3---3-
Asian 50.0 50.0600 0.0 1.7600
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--20---20-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 33.3 31.01290 2.2 0.012925
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 43.0 63.321825 4.2 0.921825
High needs 23.1 41.25125 13.5 2.05125
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--22---22-
Students w/ disabilities 6.9 26.73025 20.7 3.33025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--3---3-
Asian 78.0 95.06025 0.0 0.06025
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--20---20-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.1 47.712825 4.4 1.612825
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 53.3 60.07025 1.7 0.07025
High needs--13---13-
Econ. Disadvantaged--1---1-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--18---18-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 47.4 57.44725 2.6 0.04725
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 64.0 63.0 -1.0 51.0No142100Above Target
High needsSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 58.5 63.0 4.5 51.0No32100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-6--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-2--
AsianSGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51 76.0 64.5 -11.5 51.0No38100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51 64.0 65.5 1.5 51.0No88100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 73, Target = 51SGP = 73, Target = 51SGP = 73, Target = 51 54.0 73.0 19.0 51.0Yes142100Above Target
High needsSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 48.0 64.0 16.0 51.0Yes32100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-6--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-2--
AsianSGP = 78, Target = 51SGP = 78, Target = 51SGP = 78, Target = 51 69.0 78.0 9.0 51.0Yes38100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51 54.0 69.0 15.0 51.0Yes88100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.014-
High needs- 60.014-
EL and Former EL- 60.014-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students224223100Yes22422299Yes7171100Yes
High needs5555100Yes555498Yes14---
Econ. Disadvantaged10---10---2---
EL and Former EL24---24---5---
Students w/ disabilities3131100Yes313097Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.3---3-------
Asian636298Yes636298Yes18---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2---1---
Hispanic/Latino5---5-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.20---20---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White131131100Yes13113099Yes4848100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles