Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Philip G Coburn

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Philip G Coburn

Organization Information

District:

West Springfield (03320000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Philip G Coburn (03320007)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Pioneer Valley

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		77.2	80.6	76.6	-4.0	86.7	88.6	20	209	0	Declined
High needs		75.1	79.4	74.3	-5.1	85.5	87.6	42	178	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		80.8	80.8	74.0	-6.8	82.4	90.4	36	157	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		63.7	76.6	69.8	-6.8	78.8	81.9	47	72	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		62.8	69.4	59.4	-10.0	78.3	81.4	34	56	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		67.7	78.0	71.4	-6.6	78.5	83.9	3	28	0	Declined
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		71.2	77.3	76.1	-1.2	83.2	85.6	65	46	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		80.4	82.3	77.5	-4.8	88.6	90.2	9	120	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.8	84.1	81.5	-2.6	89.4	90.9	32	208	0	Declined
High needs		80.0	83.0	79.5	-3.5	88.3	90.0	66	177	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		84.3	84.3	78.8	-5.5	85.6	92.2	61	156	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		74.7	87.3	79.5	-7.8	85.2	87.4	67	72	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		65.2	67.6	58.5	-9.1	79.7	82.6	32	56	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		83.3	92.0	83.9	-8.1	88.9	91.7	10	28	0	Declined
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		72.4	76.2	76.7	0.5	83.9	86.2	64	45	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		85.2	85.8	82.9	-2.9	91.4	92.6	24	120	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.6	71.4	63.9	-7.5	70.0	74.3	16	63	0	Declined
High needs		47.3	67.5	61.1	-6.4	69.3	73.7	29	54	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		70.5	70.5	61.5	-9.0	73.0	85.3	39	48	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		37.1	-	50.0	-6.8	63.3	68.6	37	25	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		51.5	72.8	71.5	-1.3	71.7	75.8	11	36	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	6.7	3.3	209	0	6.7	13.4	209	0
High needs	4.9	1.1	178	0	7.7	14.0	178	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.8	1.3	157	0	5.8	14.0	157	0
EL and Former EL	2.6	0.0	72	0	9.1	18.1	72	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	56	0	14.8	26.8	56	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	4.0	3.6	28	0	8.0	17.9	28	0
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	2.3	4.3	46	25	9.3	15.2	46	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	8.1	2.5	120	0	4.9	12.5	120	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	22.0	22.6	208	0	6.7	9.1	208	0
High needs	18.1	18.6	177	0	7.7	10.7	177	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	19.5	20.5	156	0	7.1	11.5	156	0
EL and Former EL	20.8	15.3	72	0	6.5	12.5	72	0
Students w/ disabilities	3.7	0.0	56	0	20.4	30.4	56	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	36.0	28.6	28	0	4.0	10.7	28	0
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	11.6	13.3	45	25	9.3	11.1	45	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	21.1	24.2	120	25	6.5	7.5	120	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	4.3	6.3	63	25	12.9	28.6	63	0
High needs	1.7	3.7	54	25	15.0	31.5	54	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.0	4.2	48	25	12.0	33.3	48	0
EL and Former EL	3.0	4.0	25	25	30.3	44.0	25	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	4.4	11.1	36	25	11.1	16.7	36	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		49.0	53.0	4.0	51.0	No	106	75	On Target
High needs		49.5	52.0	2.5	51.0	No	87	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		49.0	52.0	3.0	51.0	No	75	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		55.0	59.0	4.0	51.0	No	32	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		43.0	29.5	-13.5	51.0	No	26	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	25	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		49.0	39.0	-10.0	51.0	No	63	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.5	53.0	4.5	51.0	No	106	75	On Target
High needs		51.0	51.0	0.0	51.0	No	87	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		51.0	50.0	-1.0	51.0	No	75	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		67.0	56.0	-11.0	51.0	No	32	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		46.0	35.5	-10.5	51.0	No	26	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	25	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		51.5	51.0	-0.5	51.0	No	63	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	82.0	60.0	101.00	25
High needs	82.0	60.0	101.00	25
EL and Former EL	82.0	60.0	101.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	242	242	100	Yes	244	244	100	Yes	76	76	100	Yes
High needs	211	211	100	Yes	212	212	100	Yes	67	67	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	183	183	100	Yes	183	183	100	Yes	59	59	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	99	99	100	Yes	101	101	100	Yes	36	36	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	60	60	100	Yes	60	60	100	Yes	24	24	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	33	33	100	Yes	34	34	100	Yes	14	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	54	54	100	Yes	53	53	100	Yes	15	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	135	135	100	Yes	136	136	100	Yes	42	42	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.