Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Weston Middle

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Weston Middle

Organization Information

District:

Weston (03300000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Weston Middle (03300305)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		98.7	95.0	96.4	1.4	99.2	99.4	89	505	75	On Target
High needs		94.3	85.0	89.3	4.3	96.7	97.2	91	121	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		87.8	87.8	86.1	-1.7	88.8	93.9	64	27	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		94.0	-	-	-	-	97.0	-	25	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		94.0	81.3	88.0	6.7	96.5	97.0	95	83	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Asian		98.7	97.5	99.6	2.1	99.2	99.4	92	71	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		94.7	85.1	88.5	3.4	96.9	97.4	83	37	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		99.0	95.3	96.9	1.6	99.4	99.5	88	352	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		92.2	90.4	92.8	2.4	95.5	96.1	96	503	100	Above Target
High needs		75.2	71.0	77.3	6.3	85.5	87.6	92	120	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		80.4	80.4	73.1	-7.3	82.0	90.2	71	27	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		82.5	-	-	-	-	91.3	-	25	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		71.0	63.2	72.3	9.1	83.1	85.5	95	82	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Asian		97.4	97.9	98.2	0.3	98.5	98.7	87	71	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		77.3	75.0	74.3	-0.7	86.8	88.7	85	37	25	No Change
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		91.9	90.6	94.0	3.4	95.3	96.0	96	350	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.2	87.9	89.4	1.5	92.5	93.6	95	161	100	Above Target
High needs		69.2	73.1	69.7	-3.4	82.0	84.6	86	38	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		67.4	68.6	61.6	-7.0	81.0	83.7	83	28	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		91.7	-	-	-	-	95.9	-	23	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		87.8	89.5	91.2	1.7	92.9	93.9	96	116	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	22.2	26.7	505	25	1.8	1.2	505	25
High needs	4.5	5.0	121	25	6.8	4.1	121	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.8	14.8	27	25	5.4	3.7	27	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	25	-	-	-	25	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	1.2	83	25	8.7	4.8	83	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Asian	38.0	40.8	71	0	0.0	0.0	71	25
Afr. Amer./Black	8.1	2.7	37	0	2.7	5.4	37	0
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	21.2	27.6	352	25	2.0	0.9	352	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	45.8	55.7	503	25	6.2	4.4	503	25
High needs	18.2	23.3	120	25	23.5	15.8	120	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	27.0	29.6	27	0	13.5	14.8	27	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	25	-	-	-	25	-
Students w/ disabilities	6.6	13.4	82	25	30.8	22.0	82	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Asian	74.6	80.3	71	0	1.4	0.0	71	25
Afr. Amer./Black	10.8	10.8	37	0	13.5	13.5	37	0
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	45.1	55.7	350	25	6.4	4.0	350	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	11.4	26.7	161	25	2.4	6.8	161	0
High needs	5.7	0.0	38	0	9.4	21.1	38	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.9	0.0	28	0	8.6	28.6	28	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	10.8	26.7	116	25	2.0	5.2	116	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		40.0	39.0	-1.0	51.0	Yes	481	75	On Target
High needs		41.5	41.0	-0.5	51.0	Yes	109	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		32.0	32.0	0.0	51.0	No	27	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		41.0	46.0	5.0	51.0	Yes	77	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Asian		50.0	44.0	-6.0	51.0	Yes	67	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		24.5	30.0	5.5	51.0	Yes	37	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		40.5	39.0	-1.5	51.0	Yes	336	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		55.0	52.0	-3.0	51.0	Yes	473	75	On Target
High needs		51.0	49.0	-2.0	51.0	Yes	105	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		55.0	44.0	-11.0	51.0	No	27	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		44.0	49.0	5.0	51.0	Yes	73	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Asian		71.0	54.0	-17.0	51.0	No	67	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		40.0	40.0	0.0	51.0	No	37	25	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		51.0	53.0	2.0	51.0	Yes	328	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	7.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	7.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	7.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	526	518	98	Yes	526	516	98	Yes	171	166	97	Yes
High needs	130	128	98	Yes	130	127	98	Yes	42	41	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	29	29	100	Yes	29	29	100	Yes	10	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	30	30	100	Yes	30	30	100	Yes	8	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	86	84	98	Yes	86	83	97	Yes	30	29	97	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Asian	77	77	100	Yes	77	77	100	Yes	26	26	100	Yes
Afr. Amer./Black	37	37	100	Yes	37	37	100	Yes	12	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	21	-	-	-	21	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	23	-	-	-	23	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	364	358	98	Yes	364	356	98	Yes	123	118	96	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.