Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Happy Hollow School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Happy Hollow School
Organization Information
District:Wayland (03150000)School type:Elementary School
School:Happy Hollow School (03150015)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.5, Target = 95.9CPI = 90.5, Target = 95.9CPI = 90.5, Target = 95.9 93.0 90.0 90.5 0.5 95.9 96.5 7321050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 74.2, Target = 89.7CPI = 74.2, Target = 89.7CPI = 74.2, Target = 89.7 82.4 75.8 74.2 -1.6 89.7 91.2 416225No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75.5, Target = 87.3CPI = 75.5, Target = 87.3CPI = 75.5, Target = 87.3 78.3 75.5 75.5 0.0 87.3 89.2 784625No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 92.8, Target = 100CPI = 92.8, Target = 100CPI = 92.8, Target = 100 100.0 94.4 92.8 -1.6 100.0 100.0 464575On Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------17--
Hispanic/Latino -------15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.7, Target = 95.7CPI = 94.7, Target = 95.7 92.7 92.2 94.7 2.5 95.7 96.4 89119100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.7, Target = 95.6CPI = 90.7, Target = 95.6CPI = 90.7, Target = 95.6 92.4 90.0 90.7 0.7 95.6 96.2 7521050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 72.6, Target = 88.7CPI = 72.6, Target = 88.7CPI = 72.6, Target = 88.7 80.7 74.6 72.6 -2.0 88.7 90.4 356225No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 68.5, Target = 86.4CPI = 68.5, Target = 86.4CPI = 68.5, Target = 86.4 76.6 72.9 68.5 -4.4 86.4 88.3 61460Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 95.6, Target = 99.7CPI = 95.6, Target = 99.7CPI = 95.6, Target = 99.7 99.4 96.9 95.6 -1.3 99.7 99.7 4645100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------17--
Hispanic/Latino -------15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.2, Target = 95.5CPI = 92.2, Target = 95.5CPI = 92.2, Target = 95.5 92.2 92.0 92.2 0.2 95.5 96.1 7611975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.1, Target = 95.5CPI = 88.1, Target = 95.5CPI = 88.1, Target = 95.5 92.2 89.8 88.1 -1.7 95.5 96.1 756725No Change
High needs -------15--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------5--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------18--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.6, Target = 94.9CPI = 88.6, Target = 94.9CPI = 88.6, Target = 94.9 91.2 90.7 88.6 -2.1 94.9 95.6 683325No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.8 25.221025 2.7 4.82100
High needs 3.1 1.6620 9.4 16.1620
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 2.1 0.0460 10.6 15.2460
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 36.7 35.6450 2.0 6.7450
Afr. Amer./Black--17---17-
Hispanic/Latino--15---15-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--14---14-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.7 23.511925 1.6 0.811925
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 46.6 51.02100 3.2 5.22100
High needs 20.3 16.1620 9.4 17.7620
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 14.9 13.0460 10.6 21.7460
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 71.4 73.3450 0.0 2.2450
Afr. Amer./Black--17---17-
Hispanic/Latino--15---15-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--14---14-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 45.1 50.411925 2.5 4.21190
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.9 32.86725 0.0 4.5670
High needs--15---15-
Econ. Disadvantaged--5---5-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--18---18-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 17.6 24.23325 0.0 3.0330
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 50.5 65.0 14.5 51.0No137100Above Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 39.0 44.0 5.0 51.0No4150Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-13--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 39.0 45.0 6.0 51.0No2950Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 79.5, Target = 51SGP = 79.5, Target = 51SGP = 79.5, Target = 51 49.0 79.5 30.5 51.0No30100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-12--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 56.5 64.0 7.5 51.0Yes75100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 61.0 66.0 5.0 51.0Yes137100Above Target
High needsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 52.0 54.0 2.0 51.0No4175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-13--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 52.0 56.0 4.0 51.0No2975On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 71.5, Target = 51SGP = 71.5, Target = 51SGP = 71.5, Target = 51 70.0 71.5 1.5 51.0No30100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-12--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 64.5 67.0 2.5 51.0Yes75100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.07-
High needs- 60.07-
EL and Former EL- 60.07-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students215215100Yes215215100Yes6868100Yes
High needs6565100Yes6565100Yes15---
Econ. Disadvantaged21---21---5---
EL and Former EL7---7---1---
Students w/ disabilities4848100Yes4848100Yes10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4747100Yes4747100Yes19---
Afr. Amer./Black17---17---5---
Hispanic/Latino16---16---6---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.14---14---5---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White121121100Yes121121100Yes3333100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles