Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Wareham Elementary School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Minot Forest

Organization Information
District:Wareham (03100000)School type:Elementary School
School:Minot Forest (03100017)Grades served:PK,03,04
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 72.6, Target = 91CPI = 72.6, Target = 91CPI = 72.6, Target = 91 84.6 73.7 72.6 -1.1 91.0 92.3 1237425No Change
High needsCPI = 66.4, Target = 87.4CPI = 66.4, Target = 87.4CPI = 66.4, Target = 87.4 78.4 67.1 66.4 -0.7 87.4 89.2 1424625No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 67.8, Target = 70.7CPI = 67.8, Target = 70.7CPI = 67.8, Target = 70.7 68.0 68.0 67.8 -0.2 70.7 84.0 1720825No Change
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 51.8, Target = 79.8CPI = 51.8, Target = 79.8CPI = 51.8, Target = 79.8 65.3 55.1 51.8 -3.3 79.8 82.7 171000Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 58.9, Target = 70.7CPI = 58.9, Target = 70.7CPI = 58.9, Target = 70.7 68.0 68.0 58.9 -9.1 70.7 84.0 7280Declined
Hispanic/Latino -------24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.CPI = 59.7, Target = 92.1CPI = 59.7, Target = 92.1CPI = 59.7, Target = 92.1 86.4 76.7 59.7 -17.0 92.1 93.2 5310Declined
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 75.2, Target = 91.6CPI = 75.2, Target = 91.6CPI = 75.2, Target = 91.6 85.6 74.4 75.2 0.8 91.6 92.8 628350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 72, Target = 90CPI = 72, Target = 90CPI = 72, Target = 90 82.9 74.9 72.0 -2.9 90.0 91.5 113710Declined
High needsCPI = 66, Target = 86.2CPI = 66, Target = 86.2CPI = 66, Target = 86.2 76.4 68.1 66.0 -2.1 86.2 88.2 1524325No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 67.4, Target = 70.9CPI = 67.4, Target = 70.9CPI = 67.4, Target = 70.9 68.3 68.3 67.4 -0.9 70.9 84.2 1720725No Change
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 51.8, Target = 77.4CPI = 51.8, Target = 77.4CPI = 51.8, Target = 77.4 61.2 60.2 51.8 -8.4 77.4 80.6 17980Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 60.7, Target = 66.4CPI = 60.7, Target = 66.4CPI = 60.7, Target = 66.4 63.3 63.3 60.7 -2.6 66.4 81.7 12280Declined
Hispanic/Latino -------22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.CPI = 61.3, Target = 91.7CPI = 61.3, Target = 91.7CPI = 61.3, Target = 91.7 85.7 71.6 61.3 -10.3 91.7 92.9 14310Declined
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 74.6, Target = 90.8CPI = 74.6, Target = 90.8CPI = 74.6, Target = 90.8 84.3 76.7 74.6 -2.1 90.8 92.2 728225No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 4.0 2.43740 13.1 16.63740
High needs 1.6 0.02460 18.7 22.02460
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.0 0.02080 17.1 20.22080
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.01000 34.6 42.01000
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black 3.1 0.0280 12.5 35.7280
Hispanic/Latino--24---24-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 6.9 0.0310 3.4 32.3310
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 4.1 2.82830 13.4 13.12830
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 14.1 15.43710 14.8 19.13710
High needs 8.9 9.924325 20.7 25.92430
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.8 11.120725 18.6 24.22070
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 3.7 2.0980 29.6 43.9980
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black 6.3 10.72825 18.8 28.6280
Hispanic/Latino--22---22-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 17.2 12.9310 20.7 29.0310
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.6 16.728225 13.4 16.32820
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 48.0 52.0 4.0 51.0No17075On Target
High needsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 38.0 50.0 12.0 51.0No10375On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 38.0 51.0 13.0 51.0No8675On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51 32.0 33.0 1.0 51.0No3350Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-14--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 46.0 52.0 6.0 51.0No12575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 56.0 60.0 4.0 51.0No169100Above Target
High needsSGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51 49.0 56.5 7.5 51.0No10275On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 49.0 57.0 8.0 51.0No8675On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51 47.0 42.5 -4.5 51.0No3250Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-14--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 54.0 65.0 11.0 51.0No125100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.06-
High needs- 60.06-
EL and Former EL- 60.06-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students39439299Yes39639399Yes----
High needs26326199Yes26426199Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged224223100Yes226225100Yes----
EL and Former EL9---9-------
Students w/ disabilities10810799Yes10810698Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.2---2-------
Asian7---7-------
Afr. Amer./Black2929100Yes3030100Yes----
Hispanic/Latino27---25-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3232100Yes3333100Yes----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White29729599Yes29929699Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles