Massachusetts School and District Profiles

William F. Stanley Elementary School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - William F. Stanley Elementary School

Organization Information

District:

Waltham (03080000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

William F. Stanley Elementary School (03080005)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.4	79.2	76.5	-2.7	90.9	92.2	20	216	0	Declined
High needs		77.9	69.0	67.6	-1.4	87.1	89.0	17	122	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		68.2	68.2	69.9	1.7	70.9	84.1	22	64	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		73.8	60.0	61.9	1.9	84.7	86.9	21	67	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		70.9	57.6	60.8	3.2	83.0	85.5	40	53	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		78.6	71.2	68.9	-2.3	87.5	89.3	34	110	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		88.5	86.3	84.5	-1.8	93.3	94.3	30	79	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		78.9	73.7	71.7	-2.0	87.7	89.5	10	217	25	No Change
High needs		73.9	64.4	63.0	-1.4	84.8	87.0	9	123	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		64.5	64.5	60.5	-4.0	67.5	82.3	5	64	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		73.8	49.4	52.6	3.2	84.7	86.9	5	67	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		69.6	62.5	59.7	-2.8	82.3	84.8	35	54	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		71.7	66.2	60.9	-5.3	83.5	85.9	12	110	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		86.5	80.9	82.5	1.6	92.1	93.3	22	80	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		85.8	85.4	78.0	-7.4	91.7	92.9	40	59	0	Declined
High needs		80.5	82.5	68.9	-13.6	88.6	90.3	53	33	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		77.9	-	-	-	-	89.0	-	31	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		82.5	91.3	90.0	-1.3	89.8	91.3	76	20	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	7.8	8.8	216	25	10.4	13.9	216	0
High needs	4.8	0.0	122	0	18.3	20.5	122	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.3	0.0	64	0	21.8	20.3	64	0
EL and Former EL	4.4	0.0	67	0	26.7	22.4	67	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	53	0	34.8	32.1	53	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Hispanic/Latino	3.3	1.8	110	0	15.4	19.1	110	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	12.5	16.5	79	25	6.3	8.9	79	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	9.9	12.4	217	25	16.1	17.1	217	0
High needs	3.8	2.4	123	0	26.0	25.2	123	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.5	3.1	64	0	27.3	28.1	64	0
EL and Former EL	2.2	1.5	67	0	40.0	34.3	67	25
Students w/ disabilities	2.2	0.0	54	0	34.8	33.3	54	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Hispanic/Latino	3.3	2.7	110	0	24.2	25.5	110	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	18.8	25.0	80	25	7.5	8.8	80	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	11.3	6.8	59	0	5.7	11.9	59	0
High needs	6.7	0.0	33	0	10.0	18.2	33	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	31	-	-	-	31	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	23.1	10.0	20	0	3.8	5.0	20	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		64.5	58.0	-6.5	51.0	No	123	75	On Target
High needs		63.5	50.0	-13.5	51.0	No	61	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		61.0	43.0	-18.0	51.0	Yes	31	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	34	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		63.0	58.0	-5.0	51.0	No	63	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		65.5	65.0	-0.5	51.0	Yes	46	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		58.0	47.0	-11.0	51.0	No	125	50	Below Target
High needs		55.5	45.0	-10.5	51.0	No	63	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	31	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	35	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		53.5	43.5	-10.0	51.0	No	64	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		63.5	58.0	-5.5	51.0	No	47	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	63.0	60.0	96.00	25
High needs	63.0	60.0	96.00	25
EL and Former EL	63.0	60.0	96.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	228	224	98	Yes	227	224	99	Yes	62	62	100	Yes
High needs	131	130	99	Yes	130	130	100	Yes	36	36	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	68	68	100	Yes	67	67	100	Yes	18	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	75	75	100	Yes	74	74	100	Yes	19	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	54	53	98	Yes	54	54	100	Yes	14	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	15	-	-	-	15	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	116	116	100	Yes	115	115	100	Yes	34	34	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	83	79	95	Yes	83	80	96	Yes	20	20	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.