Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Proctor Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Proctor Elementary
Organization Information
District:Topsfield (02980000)School type:Elementary School
School:Proctor Elementary (02980005)Grades served:04,05,06
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.4, Target = 96.8CPI = 91.4, Target = 96.8CPI = 91.4, Target = 96.8 94.5 91.6 91.4 -0.2 96.8 97.3 7626325No Change
High needsCPI = 73.9, Target = 90.4CPI = 73.9, Target = 90.4CPI = 73.9, Target = 90.4 83.6 79.2 73.9 -5.3 90.4 91.8 40690Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 69.2, Target = 90.2CPI = 69.2, Target = 90.2CPI = 69.2, Target = 90.2 83.2 75.9 69.2 -6.7 90.2 91.6 63560Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.1, Target = 96.6CPI = 91.1, Target = 96.6CPI = 91.1, Target = 96.6 94.2 92.0 91.1 -0.9 96.6 97.1 6724725No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.1, Target = 94.7CPI = 90.1, Target = 94.7CPI = 90.1, Target = 94.7 90.9 89.5 90.1 0.6 94.7 95.5 7126250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 72.5, Target = 85.7CPI = 72.5, Target = 85.7CPI = 72.5, Target = 85.7 75.4 75.0 72.5 -2.5 85.7 87.7 346925No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 67.4, Target = 84.9CPI = 67.4, Target = 84.9CPI = 67.4, Target = 84.9 74.1 70.3 67.4 -2.9 84.9 87.1 59560Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.1, Target = 94.6CPI = 90.1, Target = 94.6CPI = 90.1, Target = 94.6 90.7 89.5 90.1 0.6 94.6 95.4 6324650Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.6, Target = 95CPI = 80.6, Target = 95CPI = 80.6, Target = 95 91.5 86.3 80.6 -5.7 95.0 95.8 49890Declined
High needsCPI = 65, Target = 86.7CPI = 65, Target = 86.7CPI = 65, Target = 86.7 77.2 71.4 65.0 -6.4 86.7 88.6 42300Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities  78.4---- 89.2-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 80.2, Target = 95.2CPI = 80.2, Target = 95.2CPI = 80.2, Target = 95.2 91.8 86.8 80.2 -6.6 95.2 95.9 28820Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.8 24.026325 2.3 4.92630
High needs 7.0 5.8690 5.6 17.4690
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 7.0 3.6560 7.0 21.4560
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.7 23.924725 2.0 5.32470
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 34.7 42.726225 3.4 7.32620
High needs 16.7 21.76925 11.1 24.6690
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 10.3 17.95625 13.8 30.4560
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 34.7 41.924625 3.7 6.92460
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.2 14.6890 3.2 4.5890
High needs 10.7 3.3300 10.7 13.3300
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 23.6 13.4820 2.2 4.9820
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 48.0 51.0 3.0 51.0Yes25575On Target
High needsSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 45.5 36.0 -9.5 51.0No6725Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 30.5, Target = 51SGP = 30.5, Target = 51SGP = 30.5, Target = 51 47.0 30.5 -16.5 51.0No5425Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 47.5 50.0 2.5 51.0Yes23975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 61.0 59.0 -2.0 51.0Yes25475On Target
High needsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 58.0 52.0 -6.0 51.0Yes6775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 49.5 52.0 2.5 51.0Yes5475On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 61.0 59.0 -2.0 51.0Yes23875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students26726599Yes26726499Yes9090100Yes
High needs727097Yes727097Yes3030100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged20---20---10---
EL and Former EL1---1-------
Students w/ disabilities585697Yes585697Yes2222100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2-------
Afr. Amer./Black2---2-------
Hispanic/Latino11---11---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White25024899Yes25024799Yes8383100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles