Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Tisbury Elementary

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Tisbury Elementary

Organization Information

District:

Tisbury (02960000)

School type:

Elementary-Middle School

School:

Tisbury Elementary (02960005)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		95.4	89.2	95.7	6.5	97.3	97.7	95	209	100	Above Target
High needs		91.8	84.3	92.8	8.5	95.2	95.9	98	90	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		89.2	89.2	94.7	5.5	90.1	94.6	98	52	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		87.5	-	-	-	-	93.8	-	29	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		89.5	80.0	89.4	9.4	93.9	94.8	99	26	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		92.0	84.7	96.1	11.4	95.3	96.0	98	38	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		96.0	92.5	96.3	3.8	97.7	98.0	89	140	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		88.6	92.8	93.7	0.9	93.4	94.3	95	211	100	Above Target
High needs		80.7	87.4	89.6	2.2	88.7	90.4	97	91	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		88.4	88.4	92.5	4.1	89.4	94.2	97	53	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		79.5	-	-	-	-	89.8	-	30	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		78.6	80.2	76.0	-4.2	87.5	89.3	92	26	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		82.7	87.9	93.4	5.5	89.9	91.4	97	38	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		90.1	95.1	94.7	-0.4	94.2	95.1	90	141	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		79.0	89.3	91.9	2.6	87.8	89.5	96	65	100	Above Target
High needs		70.1	80.4	85.7	5.3	82.6	85.1	96	28	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		81.1	93.5	94.6	1.1	89.0	90.6	97	46	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	12.7	27.8	209	25	3.6	0.0	209	25
High needs	7.0	13.3	90	25	8.1	0.0	90	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.3	19.2	52	25	1.7	0.0	52	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	29	-	-	-	29	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	7.7	26	25	13.3	0.0	26	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Hispanic/Latino	2.8	15.8	38	25	8.3	0.0	38	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	16.5	32.9	140	25	1.5	0.0	140	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	31.3	41.7	211	25	1.5	2.4	211	0
High needs	15.3	27.5	91	25	3.5	5.5	91	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	17.2	35.8	53	25	3.4	1.9	53	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	30	-	-	-	30	-
Students w/ disabilities	6.9	15.4	26	25	6.9	15.4	26	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	17.1	26.3	38	25	2.9	5.3	38	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	37.1	46.8	141	25	0.0	1.4	141	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	20.6	23.1	65	25	4.8	0.0	65	25
High needs	7.1	14.3	28	25	10.7	0.0	28	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	28.3	28.3	46	0	0.0	0.0	46	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		21.0	76.0	55.0	51.0	Yes	153	100	Above Target
High needs		22.0	65.0	43.0	51.0	Yes	61	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		22.0	67.0	45.0	51.0	Yes	35	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	28	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		18.5	76.0	57.5	51.0	Yes	103	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		47.0	57.0	10.0	51.0	Yes	151	75	On Target
High needs		45.5	59.0	13.5	51.0	Yes	59	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		43.0	59.0	16.0	51.0	Yes	34	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		45.0	63.0	18.0	51.0	Yes	26	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		47.0	55.0	8.0	51.0	Yes	103	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	79.5	60.0	40.00	25
High needs	79.5	60.0	40.00	25
EL and Former EL	79.5	60.0	40.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	216	213	99	Yes	217	217	100	Yes	65	65	100	Yes
High needs	96	94	98	Yes	97	97	100	Yes	28	28	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	54	54	100	Yes	55	55	100	Yes	18	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	35	33	94	No	36	36	100	Yes	8	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	26	26	100	Yes	26	26	100	Yes	10	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	9	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	42	42	100	Yes	42	42	100	Yes	14	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	141	138	98	Yes	141	141	100	Yes	46	46	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.